Letting the left meme is like giving a toddler a gun...
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (43)
sorted by:
I got the point. I was just addressing the original "meme".
I understand Democrats were the dominant party in the South until the turn of the 21st century. Thinking that has anything to do with the contemporary form of the Democratic party is simply misunderstanding history.
I acknowledge that the Republican party has become the premier party for advocates of small government. That doesn't change the fact that they're by and large all weak cucks.
Yes, but they aren't the ones own-goaling here.
It's the democrats that are so concerned about the appearance of historical guilt, yet they show their open hypocrisy by retaining the party name.
It illustrates that their entire claim to morality is bullshit. The progs know that if they were to proclaim the democrat label itself to be malign, and try to rebrand, they would effectively just be ceding control of the DNC back to the 90's New Democrats that they've been fighting for party control since Newt took the house from them.
The Democratic party is strange in this way. They wield prog retards like a weapon. I think it's because that type of person is extravagantly weak and suckers on to whatever power center they can despite ideological differences. People like AOC absolutely wield no actual power, they're just there to keep the fucktards nodding along.
We're talking about the people that uphold Marx whenever Marx was a virulent racist, when race based politics define their rhetoric.
It goes a long way back.
Carter's failure demolished the mid century liberals. In the post-mort the Democrats realized that Reagan had managed to take old labor from them by appealing to cheap nationalism even while running the economy even further into the ground with the farm crisis and the savings and loan crisis.
Now, Reagan failed to actually reinvent the GOP because the wrong faction won in his wake. GHW Bush and the rino crowd successfully marginalized the proto-Trumps like Pat Buchanan. The proto-populists had their revenge with Ross Perot, but in a sense it was a pyrrhic victory to kick out GHW.
Meanwhile, the Democrats realized that they COULD NOT run a progressive and win. But they also couldn't win without the progressives. So the compromise they arrived at was Clinton, with an ultra progressive VP (Gore). Clinton-Gore was essentially a bait and switch the DNC played on the far left, or at least that how it came to be perceived when Gore failed in 2000. Obama inflamed that divide even further by being in many ways a continuation of Bush's policies.