Not directly - somebody could come here and view the link pointing there, but kotakuinaction.win uses a no-referrer policy so the request does not inform Reddit that you are following a link.
When your browser makes an HTTP request, it may optionally include a referrer URL. This allows servers to treat requests differently based on what webpage they're being linked from (like supporting embedded images on your website but not supporting bandwidth leeching), provides info about where your webpage is getting attention, etc.
If you look at the source code for this page, you will find a pair of meta tags in the header:
<meta name="referrer" content="never">
<meta name="referrer" content="no-referrer">
As far as I know the first one doesn't do anything, but the second tells your browser that any links on this webpage should not include that referrer information. Checking the request header confirms that the referrer was not included.
I mean, that should be the bare minimum, shouldn't it?
It's not like I chase you around to call you out for stupid stuff. I just find it quite fucking annoying when you do paranoid shit like this. That is all.
I suppose it just "irks" me that you sometimes treat this place like it's Reddit. It ain't Reddit, thank god. As Grumman pointed out.
Also, I suppose part of it could be that I really, really fucking hate suck-ups, and you have a crew of them.
Sometimes it falls on the rest of us to counter that.
But anyway, Grumman already pointed out that you're seemingly incorrect, here, so... At least now you know that (how you didn't already... I'm not sure).
Also, there's definitely someone on here who crossposts regularly from here back to LockdownSkepticismAU. I'm not sure who it is, though... Clearly they're more subtle than me. So if you WERE right, here... I would be more worried about that, probably.
Well, fortunately, this is not linking to the sub that is being criticised, here...
I can't imagine JustUnsubbed is going to give a flying fuck, and for r/News to actually bother to chase this up, and come after us..?
That's some 4D chess paranoia you got there, bruh... Not that uhh, that surprises me in the slightest, at this point, going off your previous efforts...
Oh, and they then proceeded to brigade r/JustUnsubbed to call "the unvaccinated" the "true evil", by the way... Because of course they did.
Never mind Reddit's TOS... Nah, "We're on the right side of history, so it's alll gooooodddd"... :-(
Evil POS. They all are.
Don't post links directly to Reddit. The subreddits can see that we link to them and claim it as evidence of harassment.
I give a fuck because I still have to consider that we still have a subreddit that we can draw people from.
Fuck em, they should feel harassed. Let the bugmen see outside the echo chamber for once.
Not directly - somebody could come here and view the link pointing there, but kotakuinaction.win uses a no-referrer policy so the request does not inform Reddit that you are following a link.
Wow, love that you know more than our "chief janny", about that...
Trés amusing, if I do say so myself.
Sorry Dom, but you're being a pain in the arse, here. And I do so love antagonising you when you are being exactly that... rolls eyes
I hadn't heard of that, how does it work?
When your browser makes an HTTP request, it may optionally include a referrer URL. This allows servers to treat requests differently based on what webpage they're being linked from (like supporting embedded images on your website but not supporting bandwidth leeching), provides info about where your webpage is getting attention, etc.
If you look at the source code for this page, you will find a pair of meta tags in the header:
<meta name="referrer" content="never">
<meta name="referrer" content="no-referrer">
As far as I know the first one doesn't do anything, but the second tells your browser that any links on this webpage should not include that referrer information. Checking the request header confirms that the referrer was not included.
Also, there literally isn't a rule in the sidebar for that. Better add one quick smart so you can justify yourself, here, hey?
I really don't know why you insist on being a dick to me.
I'm just pointing out the truth, in this case.
I mean, that should be the bare minimum, shouldn't it?
It's not like I chase you around to call you out for stupid stuff. I just find it quite fucking annoying when you do paranoid shit like this. That is all.
I suppose it just "irks" me that you sometimes treat this place like it's Reddit. It ain't Reddit, thank god. As Grumman pointed out.
Also, I suppose part of it could be that I really, really fucking hate suck-ups, and you have a crew of them.
Sometimes it falls on the rest of us to counter that.
But anyway, Grumman already pointed out that you're seemingly incorrect, here, so... At least now you know that (how you didn't already... I'm not sure).
Also, there's definitely someone on here who crossposts regularly from here back to LockdownSkepticismAU. I'm not sure who it is, though... Clearly they're more subtle than me. So if you WERE right, here... I would be more worried about that, probably.
Well, fortunately, this is not linking to the sub that is being criticised, here...
I can't imagine JustUnsubbed is going to give a flying fuck, and for r/News to actually bother to chase this up, and come after us..?
That's some 4D chess paranoia you got there, bruh... Not that uhh, that surprises me in the slightest, at this point, going off your previous efforts...
That depends on how stupid people on Reddit want to be, and what they want to claim.
Alternative Link: https://libredd.it/r/JustUnsubbed/comments/ptbcc1/just_unsubbed_from_rnews_people_ij_the_replies/
Yes, this is fine