Looked over the site some more and there is some weirdness.
Like "filter by year" has decimal precision when I don't think anyone gives a shit if something was released in the first half of 2012 vs the 2nd half. Just makes it harder to select the range you want.
Also the "racism" rating is super ambiguous. Does a high rating mean "racist facts" are mentioned like black single motherhood? Or does a high rating mean that whites aren't shit on hard enough?
Unless I missed it there could really be text elaboration. Like (I know) I enjoyed Star Trek Discovery Season 1 and 2 despite everything. But season 3 prominently features a genderblob and a tranny who were so repulsive they made it impossible to watch. Maybe some kind of tagging system with plot points would help.
This is a good start but needs a lot of refinement to be practically useful.
Considering the nature of the site I think the "racism" tag is likely anti-white propaganda.
It is weird though. Rouge One is listed as like 7.5, as high as a bunch of other really obviously woke trash, yet lots of people seem to think it was the only good one, I don't think it should be as high as Solo.
Some things are a little hard to place, but there's no room for nuance. V for Vendetta is actually rated a bit low for leftwing, since they were trying to paint a 100% authoritarian right wing, conservative, anti-degeneracy future as the bad dystopia. Yet the movie is also unintentionally based, as it shows the exact world we currently live in, but it's the degenerate left in charge, and right wing values being targeted and suppressed.
Also, sorting in reverse for "least woke" it seems they forgot to have a rating for "degenerate trash."
To toot my own own horn I liked the review format that I came up with
a line of "go/no go"
a "trailer tier" summary
detailed description of the "offensive" content from 0-5, with 3 pushing into unwatchable
The details are broken down into 4 categories:
diversity - either out-of-place and obviously shoehorned-in minorities including anti-stereotype/realism stuff like black scientists
feminism - women showing up men or exhibiting hyper-competency with no in-story explanation, lecturing, being snarky and bitchy and generally acting like cunts for "laughs" - prominent roles taken by intentinally unattractive women
faggotry - any degeneracy or normalization of homos, any gender confusion automatically makes it at least a 3
subversion - a catch all for any general anti west, anti tradition messaging/plot including stuff like race mixing, anti christianity, anti family
Looked over the site some more and there is some weirdness.
Like "filter by year" has decimal precision when I don't think anyone gives a shit if something was released in the first half of 2012 vs the 2nd half. Just makes it harder to select the range you want.
Also the "racism" rating is super ambiguous. Does a high rating mean "racist facts" are mentioned like black single motherhood? Or does a high rating mean that whites aren't shit on hard enough?
Unless I missed it there could really be text elaboration. Like (I know) I enjoyed Star Trek Discovery Season 1 and 2 despite everything. But season 3 prominently features a genderblob and a tranny who were so repulsive they made it impossible to watch. Maybe some kind of tagging system with plot points would help.
This is a good start but needs a lot of refinement to be practically useful.
Considering the nature of the site I think the "racism" tag is likely anti-white propaganda.
It is weird though. Rouge One is listed as like 7.5, as high as a bunch of other really obviously woke trash, yet lots of people seem to think it was the only good one, I don't think it should be as high as Solo.
Some things are a little hard to place, but there's no room for nuance. V for Vendetta is actually rated a bit low for leftwing, since they were trying to paint a 100% authoritarian right wing, conservative, anti-degeneracy future as the bad dystopia. Yet the movie is also unintentionally based, as it shows the exact world we currently live in, but it's the degenerate left in charge, and right wing values being targeted and suppressed.
Also, sorting in reverse for "least woke" it seems they forgot to have a rating for "degenerate trash."
To toot my own own horn I liked the review format that I came up with
The details are broken down into 4 categories:
diversity - either out-of-place and obviously shoehorned-in minorities including anti-stereotype/realism stuff like black scientists
feminism - women showing up men or exhibiting hyper-competency with no in-story explanation, lecturing, being snarky and bitchy and generally acting like cunts for "laughs" - prominent roles taken by intentinally unattractive women
faggotry - any degeneracy or normalization of homos, any gender confusion automatically makes it at least a 3
subversion - a catch all for any general anti west, anti tradition messaging/plot including stuff like race mixing, anti christianity, anti family
a couple of reviews showing the system
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12iNnbYdBB/movie-review-the-mitchells-vs-th/
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12iNGllmwj/nobody-review/
Maybe free text isn't necessary but a more granular tagging system would help.
For example "mentions white privilege" is a very specific dialogue/plot point that indicates lefty trash.