You can more-or-less find a research paper abstract that says anything.
It just seems bush league that their refutation of Ground Penetrating Radar was them reading some lines off of a computer screen.
I can see why it might be a hard political climate to find a Canadian GPR expert to go on record, but surely they could have interviewed an impartial expert from abroad to explain how the technique works and its limitations?
You can more-or-less find a research paper abstract that says anything.
It just seems bush league that their refutation of Ground Penetrating Radar was them reading some lines off of a computer screen.
I can see why it might be a hard political climate to find a Canadian GPR expert to go on record, but surely they could have interviewed an impartial expert from abroad to explain how the technique works and its limitations?