Interesting documentary, but pretty light on actual facts or firsthand interviews.
The only new information I learned over the 30 minutes was that the claim of grave markers in Saskatchewan being removed by a rogue Catholic priest is actually just hearsay from the First Nation itself, and there is no confirmation from the local diocese or any records or evidence to support the claim.
The rest of the information this documentary uses to question and refute the sketchy Kamloops and Cranbrook, BC claims has been publicly available for months.
You would think the two creators could have at least interviewed someone on camera with expertise on ground-penetrating radar to explain the limitations of the science rather than reading scientific papers aloud themselves.
Well if you watched the video you would see no one from kamloops would talk to them. Are the research papers not enough evidence? I always read these articles about mass graves online but not a single one showed the mass graves. These bodies were never dug up, how do they even know they're children?
You can more-or-less find a research paper abstract that says anything.
It just seems bush league that their refutation of Ground Penetrating Radar was them reading some lines off of a computer screen.
I can see why it might be a hard political climate to find a Canadian GPR expert to go on record, but surely they could have interviewed an impartial expert from abroad to explain how the technique works and its limitations?
Interesting documentary, but pretty light on actual facts or firsthand interviews.
The only new information I learned over the 30 minutes was that the claim of grave markers in Saskatchewan being removed by a rogue Catholic priest is actually just hearsay from the First Nation itself, and there is no confirmation from the local diocese or any records or evidence to support the claim.
The rest of the information this documentary uses to question and refute the sketchy Kamloops and Cranbrook, BC claims has been publicly available for months.
You would think the two creators could have at least interviewed someone on camera with expertise on ground-penetrating radar to explain the limitations of the science rather than reading scientific papers aloud themselves.
Well if you watched the video you would see no one from kamloops would talk to them. Are the research papers not enough evidence? I always read these articles about mass graves online but not a single one showed the mass graves. These bodies were never dug up, how do they even know they're children?
You can more-or-less find a research paper abstract that says anything.
It just seems bush league that their refutation of Ground Penetrating Radar was them reading some lines off of a computer screen.
I can see why it might be a hard political climate to find a Canadian GPR expert to go on record, but surely they could have interviewed an impartial expert from abroad to explain how the technique works and its limitations?