That's what happens when potential interviewees are being dishonest corrupt assholes who would rather dodge the interview entirely than make themselves look corrupt on camera.
The parts about being stonewalled by the Kamloops chief were interesting, especially the physical fence erected around the band office and the band using bullshit COVID and sovereign land narratives to completely insulate themselves from all scrutiny.
But the piece still lacked any substance even though I agree with its skepticism. They didn't mention trying to interview anyone from the Cranbrook or Saskatchewan bands also featured. They didn't seem to interview anyone in person at all. They didn't speak to any First Nations people on record, even if not directly related. They didn't get any experts on Ground Penetrating Radar on record. They didn't interview any historians, local or academic to provide evidence or context.
99% of this documentary was editorial outside of the statement from the Saskatchewan Diocese deacon.
They also spent a lot of time differentiating between "mass graves" and "unmarked graves", which they are ultimately right about sensationalism and dishonesty in journalism. But ultimately, the distinction to most normies doesn't matter because hundreds of individual unmarked graves still doesn't change the narrative that about "genocide" on the part of the federal government and Catholics Church to them.
I think the documentary raises some uncomfortable and important questions about the whole affair that no one else wants to touch. I just don't think the two actually made a strong enough case with their piece to label the whole thing as a "hoax" at this point (though I think it ultimately will be revealed to be).
That's what happens when potential interviewees are being dishonest corrupt assholes who would rather dodge the interview entirely than make themselves look corrupt on camera.
The parts about being stonewalled by the Kamloops chief were interesting, especially the physical fence erected around the band office and the band using bullshit COVID and sovereign land narratives to completely insulate themselves from all scrutiny.
But the piece still lacked any substance even though I agree with its skepticism. They didn't mention trying to interview anyone from the Cranbrook or Saskatchewan bands also featured. They didn't seem to interview anyone in person at all. They didn't speak to any First Nations people on record, even if not directly related. They didn't get any experts on Ground Penetrating Radar on record. They didn't interview any historians, local or academic to provide evidence or context.
99% of this documentary was editorial outside of the statement from the Saskatchewan Diocese deacon.
They also spent a lot of time differentiating between "mass graves" and "unmarked graves", which they are ultimately right about sensationalism and dishonesty in journalism. But ultimately, the distinction to most normies doesn't matter because hundreds of individual unmarked graves still doesn't change the narrative that about "genocide" on the part of the federal government and Catholics Church to them.
I think the documentary raises some uncomfortable and important questions about the whole affair that no one else wants to touch. I just don't think the two actually made a strong enough case with their piece to label the whole thing as a "hoax" at this point (though I think it ultimately will be revealed to be).