I think there really is some novel virus out there that has the potential to completely wreck people up. More likely to happen if you're older and/or obese or have other conditions. I've seen enough data of people with truly messed up lungs (even those without severe illness) to know it's a real thing.
BUT, it isn't nearly as contagious as the media lets on. It doesn't have asymptomatic spread, and it doesn't have an R0 of 2-4. It's probably less than 1, to be honest.
In order to drum up the necessary fear, however, they've been pushing testing. Testing that we know to be unreliable and unable to differentiate between influenza or other coronaviruses. This explains why cases go up, this explains why the "vaccines" fail and why there's no good data on what a "COVID experience" looks like.
There's been a lot of positive cases that were NOT the coof. Not 50-50, but probably more like 80-20. If someone has difficulty breathing, loss of taste and smell without congestion, and a moderate-high fever as a first symptom, I'd treat that as probable coof, but these cases of people with normal respiratory illness saying "oh yeah I got it, and I got a positive test, and I beat it and it's nothing" are probably wrong too.
The real information is just so screwed up. The people who fancy themselves arbiters of information are hopeless biased, and they're being strung along by an incompetent and corrupt bureaucracy that has been scrambling for 18 months to find any consistency in its messaging.
The "vaccines" are probably useless, but we can't get a full picture because there's so many false positives in the way.
The actual,real novel virus that was released from the Wuhan lab is probably pretty deadly -- certainly not fun to get if you're one of the unlucky ones in any case. Not 10%, not 5%, but a very serious 2-3%.
I do believe Ivermectin works - I think the Indian province of Uttar Pradesh is a nice example, but I'm not willing to throw out corruption in statistics as an explanation -- even if I like the conclusions.
Thanks for coming to my TED talk, I hope it wasn't as boring as most TED talks.
I agree with a lot of you said but what makes you think these people sick with respiratory illnesses are sick with something other than "the coof"? Especially when so many don't have any respiratory history? We know the PCR is unreliable but most respiratory illnesses are usually in the young, old, and sick. Not the healthy young adults.
"You probably just had a seasonal cold!"
So then they did have covid.
Here's my honest take:
I think there really is some novel virus out there that has the potential to completely wreck people up. More likely to happen if you're older and/or obese or have other conditions. I've seen enough data of people with truly messed up lungs (even those without severe illness) to know it's a real thing.
BUT, it isn't nearly as contagious as the media lets on. It doesn't have asymptomatic spread, and it doesn't have an R0 of 2-4. It's probably less than 1, to be honest.
In order to drum up the necessary fear, however, they've been pushing testing. Testing that we know to be unreliable and unable to differentiate between influenza or other coronaviruses. This explains why cases go up, this explains why the "vaccines" fail and why there's no good data on what a "COVID experience" looks like.
There's been a lot of positive cases that were NOT the coof. Not 50-50, but probably more like 80-20. If someone has difficulty breathing, loss of taste and smell without congestion, and a moderate-high fever as a first symptom, I'd treat that as probable coof, but these cases of people with normal respiratory illness saying "oh yeah I got it, and I got a positive test, and I beat it and it's nothing" are probably wrong too.
The real information is just so screwed up. The people who fancy themselves arbiters of information are hopeless biased, and they're being strung along by an incompetent and corrupt bureaucracy that has been scrambling for 18 months to find any consistency in its messaging.
The "vaccines" are probably useless, but we can't get a full picture because there's so many false positives in the way.
The actual, real novel virus that was released from the Wuhan lab is probably pretty deadly -- certainly not fun to get if you're one of the unlucky ones in any case. Not 10%, not 5%, but a very serious 2-3%.
I do believe Ivermectin works - I think the Indian province of Uttar Pradesh is a nice example, but I'm not willing to throw out corruption in statistics as an explanation -- even if I like the conclusions.
Thanks for coming to my TED talk, I hope it wasn't as boring as most TED talks.
I agree with a lot of you said but what makes you think these people sick with respiratory illnesses are sick with something other than "the coof"? Especially when so many don't have any respiratory history? We know the PCR is unreliable but most respiratory illnesses are usually in the young, old, and sick. Not the healthy young adults.