Australia admits it is banning ivermectin for COVID because it interferes with universal vaccine agenda
(www.yourdestinationnow.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Of course it does, but without the threat of violence, they can do whatever they want. I've said it a million times; if thousands of cops, and a dozen politicians get brutally killed on TV, it's over instantly. Killing people has worked since the dawn of humanity. There's literally nothing anyone can do once they get blown away. Judge screws you over? Kill him, you win. Cops want to arrest you? Blam-O, officer Dick, and Shit get buried by their buddies. It's been the de-facto solution since Uncle Caveman bashed some loser's head in with a rock. Not having to kill savages constantly effectively ended us.
As sad as it is, this really is why so often the judges and lawmakers always do is because when they all just decide to take away our rights... everyone just goes "oh ok" and moves on and never demands that it be changed.
I mean that is why the gun rights are so important, not just for hunting and whatever [I know I am just preaching to the choir here] but because it is a threat to an oppressive government. Problem is, it really isn't anymore because no one has a backbone to actually stand up and care when their rights are trickled away, or if someone does do something, he just gets condemned as a terrorist and everyone considers hime vil. Look I would prefer no violence myself but that is literally the point of gun rights to be a threat to a government that oppresses.