Anyone who disagrees with me is far-right, thus any disagreement is a pipeline to the far-right therefore all disagreement must be banned to save liberalism.
all disagreement must be banned to save corporate advertising profits.
FTFY: the advertisers don't like people talking politics or exposing their greed. You can't have a conversation about one, if willing to exclude the other. They are intertwined.
Years back on reddit we talked about how corporate advertising in these types of forums would lead to censorship at a corporate level, in the name of protecting profits. We were not wrong. We were, and still are, 100% right on the corporate abuse of freedom of speech on platforms they designed for us to speak on.
Anyone who disagrees with me is far-right, thus any disagreement is a pipeline to the far-right therefore all disagreement must be banned to save liberalism.
FTFY: the advertisers don't like people talking politics or exposing their greed. You can't have a conversation about one, if willing to exclude the other. They are intertwined.
Years back on reddit we talked about how corporate advertising in these types of forums would lead to censorship at a corporate level, in the name of protecting profits. We were not wrong. We were, and still are, 100% right on the corporate abuse of freedom of speech on platforms they designed for us to speak on.
Like a slow moving beartrap.
It seems like it's only "talking politics" when its unapproved politics.