Then she should leave. It's as simple as that. If people like her hate this country so much and are so miserable then simply get the hell out — no one is keeping you here.
Just because she is a retarded consumer whore desperately seeking the validation of strangers for how "kind, caring, and in touch" she is, doesn't mean any of her bullshit nonsense is reflected in observable reality. She should stop blaming society for her inability to differentiate between her echo chamber and the real world around her.
In her world, she continuously reads these stories that are essentially serving to provide confirmation bias that have little to no basis in the world we live in. They're very likely being spoon-fed to her by her goofy activist friends or algorithms and she simply eats it all up. For someone who's a "teacher," she's completely incapable of abstract thought and critical thinking — since she clearly does not understand scale. Even if she read 20 stories every day of some "violent intolerant menace," the concept of scale is something she can't seem to wrap her mind around. There at 330+ million people in the US; if you're reading a dozen stories a day and are completely unable to extrapolate that to the bigger picture of the country overall, then you're a retard — plain and simple.
It's the same problem that so many activists have. They can't seem to grasp the simple concept that "journalists," purposely seeking to create rage/clickbait and pushing it every day, does not mean there is some national or global problem. These people are dumber than rocks for being unable to see such a plainly obvious and elementary school level thing; they're mental toddlers. This fact alone should disqualify her from being able to teach, because it's blindingly apparent she's not intelligent enough to make the distinction.
This is exactly why censorship is such a cancer on our culture. It creates extremists and retards like her; it does not prevent them in any way whatsoever. Without censorship, people would be able to explain things to those like her. They'd be able too shoot down stupid ideas and opinions which are founded on corporate media's rapacious propaganda. When people have zero pushback, they begin to feel validated in their views, even when — or perhaps especially when — those views begin to become more extreme. Without someone to explain why they may be wrong or to provide a different perspective, they're left with only people who agree with their radical views, which pushes them ever deeper down the retarded activism hole they're in. It's exactly why they have no problem denigrating, assaulting, dehumanizing, labeling, or even in some cases killing, any who ideologically oppose them. Their echo chambers, created from real intolerant censorship, form the belief that they're right for doing such things.
She likely loves to give didactic lectures about violence and intolerance but is completely incapable of self-reflecting to realize that she avidly supports both — as long as they align with her political views and activism.
Then she should leave. It's as simple as that. If people like her hate this country so much and are so miserable then simply get the hell out — no one is keeping you here.
Just because she is a retarded consumer whore desperately seeking the validation of strangers for how "kind, caring, and in touch" she is, doesn't mean any of her bullshit nonsense is reflected in observable reality. She should stop blaming society for her inability to differentiate between her echo chamber and the real world around her.
In her world, she continuously reads these stories that are essentially serving to provide confirmation bias that have little to no basis in the world we live in. They're very likely being spoon-fed to her by her goofy activist friends or algorithms and she simply eats it all up. For someone who's a "teacher," she's completely incapable of abstract thought and critical thinking — since she clearly does not understand scale. Even if she read 20 stories every day of some "violent intolerant menace," the concept of scale is something she can't seem to wrap her mind around. There at 330+ million people in the US; if you're reading a dozen stories a day and are completely unable to extrapolate that to the bigger picture of the country overall, then you're a retard — plain and simple.
It's the same problem that so many activists have. They can't seem to grasp the simple concept that "journalists," purposely seeking to create rage/clickbait and pushing it every day, does not mean there is some national or global problem. These people are dumber than rocks for being unable to see such a plainly obvious and elementary school level thing; they're mental toddlers. This fact alone should disqualify her from being able to teach, because it's blindingly apparent she's not intelligent enough to make the distinction.
This is exactly why censorship is such a cancer on our culture. It creates extremists and retards like her; it does not prevent them in any way whatsoever. Without censorship, people would be able to explain things to those like her. They'd be able too shoot down stupid ideas and opinions which are founded on corporate media's rapacious propaganda. When people have zero pushback, they begin to feel validated in their views, even when — or perhaps especially when — those views begin to become more extreme. Without someone to explain why they may be wrong or to provide a different perspective, they're left with only people who agree with their radical views, which pushes them ever deeper down the retarded activism hole they're in. It's exactly why they have no problem denigrating, assaulting, dehumanizing, labeling, or even in some cases killing, any who ideologically oppose them. Their echo chambers, created from real intolerant censorship, form the belief that they're right for doing such things.
She likely loves to give didactic lectures about violence and intolerance but is completely incapable of self-reflecting to realize that she avidly supports both — as long as they align with her political views and activism.