Why the fellow people that pharmaceutical companies placed on their boards, of course!
The consensus of themselves and their little bought and paid for group!
It's a truly ridiculous statement for them to make, because as we're seeing by huge amounts of people being laid off or quitting because of vaxx mandates, their "consensus" doesn't seem particularly whole.
Especially when the most vaccine hesitant group is PhD's themselves.
In true post-modernist fashion, they've redefined "consensus" from "General agreement about some issue within a group or in public opinion." to "General agreement about some issue within a group of people who agree with me"
Or, perhaps - and more worryingly - they've stopped considered people who disagree to be people - and therefore part of the public - at all.
Which consensus? The March 2020 one? December 2020? May 2021?
How do these guys find time to treat anybody when they have to focus so much on maintaining and updating a consensus...?
Why the fellow people that pharmaceutical companies placed on their boards, of course!
The consensus of themselves and their little bought and paid for group!
It's a truly ridiculous statement for them to make, because as we're seeing by huge amounts of people being laid off or quitting because of vaxx mandates, their "consensus" doesn't seem particularly whole.
Especially when the most vaccine hesitant group is PhD's themselves.
In true post-modernist fashion, they've redefined "consensus" from "General agreement about some issue within a group or in public opinion." to "General agreement about some issue within a group of people who agree with me"
Or, perhaps - and more worryingly - they've stopped considered people who disagree to be people - and therefore part of the public - at all.