It's a nice thought, but ultimately unenforceable, honestly. Unless it happened at a Federal level it's probably not going to do much.
It would also likely be difficult to prove in any court that they were banned for that reason — even though we know that's the case.
What needs to happen is full 230 reform. 230 was made during a time when social media barely existed and was mostly irrelevant where it did.
I'm not typically a fan of Government intervention — because they mess shit up at every opportunity — but at this point BigTech needs to be regulated in much the same way that Oil/Railroad needed to be during the industrial revolution. They're a true threat to the stability of the country through their inimical actions. They actively collaborate to destroy or make it nearly impossible for any new competitor to grow, and it's become a real problem.
Think about this: 10 years ago, how many more websites did people typically visit daily? How many new tech companies popped up left and right with cool new platforms? Now, all traffic is being funneled through a select group of tech overlords who have decided that they're the ultimate authority on what people can say, like, or participate in and what beliefs and views are allowed. They even openly defend people ruining the lives of others who don't conform to their standards, while silencing any who point it out, attempt the same, or push back. The internet was a thousand times better back then.
Of course, there's way more to the problem as well, and it has many layers, but they're most certainly a harmful entity that needs to be addressed. I don't think we'll be seeing any changes at all any time soon, though. Big Tech desperately wants to grow into new markets — and that's exactly why they push a very CCP agenda and cooperate with China to a concerning level.
The retard consumers on the left who are drooling and clapping along will eventually come to understand how their stupidity and insecurity has screwed them when they need to voice opposition about something in the future, and they no longer have the ability to do it.
The retard consumers on the left who are drooling and clapping along will eventually come to understand how their stupidity and insecurity has screwed them when they need to voice opposition about something in the future, and they no longer have the ability to do it.
Lol no they won't. Just look at how the TERF's reacted when their own tactics were used against them. Instead of realizing that they created an abusive system that was ultimately turned against them they're just outraged that they're not the abusers anymore. So instead of reflecting on the rotten system that made their purging possible and trying to prevent a repeat of it on their own platforms they just copied the rotten system and locked themselves into the abuser role. In the end they just created a Faggit clone that bans men from mod positions. At least they won't have to worry about tranny jannies.
That's not a large enough example of an issue that's critically important, though. It's something that only effects a niche group, so to them, it's just further validation of their fake "oppression." It's concomitant to vacuous retards such as themselves to exclusively focus on their victimhood. The fanatics will always be the most difficult to convince; however, I don't think they're necessarily representative of the average voter/consumer who's really just more ignorant than passionate — the type who ignores such things and simply let's the TV decide. I'm not sure if I'm making sense, though. I have a bit of a migraine right now. You're certainly not wrong about their approach, but I feel like there's other factors in play that contribute in that particular situation. But who knows? Time will tell. Maybe they'll forever be ignorant of what's plainly obvious to everyone else who's not an ideologically obsessed activist.
Any sane and rational person would think mandating people get injected with experimental gene therapy would be a wakeup call for all of the idiots blindly following along, but apparently, they'd prefer to continue hitting the snooze button instead of waking the hell up.
Looking back, and maybe this is just my experience, I feel like one instance or event of it happening isn't enough for it to make anyone change their mind, honestly. A simple one off can be justified by just about anyone. They could easily tell themselves any number of lies as an excuse for why they're being censored/silenced. I feel that repetition is a very key part to people realizing what's taking place, and it's also what made many of us see the way things really are today. There was no singular event that was able to open our eyes to the mendacious nature of the prevaricators pushing propaganda. It was a series of events by politically-driven polemicists and activists who would profligately screech about victimhood and fake oppression ad infinitum in an attempt to divide everyone, push their agenda, and satiate their greed by pushing traffic to their outlet/site/channel. No matter how people called out their lies, sophistry, and apocryphal trash, they would would remain obdurate and simply toss labels at the person to discredit and silence them. Since they began, we've even seen them remove every comment section from all of their websites in order to keep people from calling them out as they were.
At the very least, I believe it's a multifaceted problem with many different groups and subgroups that will be affected. I just hope that people continue to show others the reality of how these corrupt media/tech companies operate.
Cute, you actually think everyone needs a thesaurus as opposed to simply spending a large amount of time reading and having a broad lexicon.
Words exist to be used for the proper context. Literally none of the words I used are uncommon words when reading articles or books. If you took time, you'd probably notice I tend to use many of them quite commonly. Don't brag about being ignorant; it's silly. If something like that actually triggers you, it says vastly more about your own insecurities and need to vent your crippling depression on others.
It's a nice thought, but ultimately unenforceable, honestly. Unless it happened at a Federal level it's probably not going to do much.
It would also likely be difficult to prove in any court that they were banned for that reason — even though we know that's the case.
What needs to happen is full 230 reform. 230 was made during a time when social media barely existed and was mostly irrelevant where it did.
I'm not typically a fan of Government intervention — because they mess shit up at every opportunity — but at this point BigTech needs to be regulated in much the same way that Oil/Railroad needed to be during the industrial revolution. They're a true threat to the stability of the country through their inimical actions. They actively collaborate to destroy or make it nearly impossible for any new competitor to grow, and it's become a real problem.
Think about this: 10 years ago, how many more websites did people typically visit daily? How many new tech companies popped up left and right with cool new platforms? Now, all traffic is being funneled through a select group of tech overlords who have decided that they're the ultimate authority on what people can say, like, or participate in and what beliefs and views are allowed. They even openly defend people ruining the lives of others who don't conform to their standards, while silencing any who point it out, attempt the same, or push back. The internet was a thousand times better back then.
Of course, there's way more to the problem as well, and it has many layers, but they're most certainly a harmful entity that needs to be addressed. I don't think we'll be seeing any changes at all any time soon, though. Big Tech desperately wants to grow into new markets — and that's exactly why they push a very CCP agenda and cooperate with China to a concerning level.
The retard consumers on the left who are drooling and clapping along will eventually come to understand how their stupidity and insecurity has screwed them when they need to voice opposition about something in the future, and they no longer have the ability to do it.
Lol no they won't. Just look at how the TERF's reacted when their own tactics were used against them. Instead of realizing that they created an abusive system that was ultimately turned against them they're just outraged that they're not the abusers anymore. So instead of reflecting on the rotten system that made their purging possible and trying to prevent a repeat of it on their own platforms they just copied the rotten system and locked themselves into the abuser role. In the end they just created a Faggit clone that bans men from mod positions. At least they won't have to worry about tranny jannies.
That's not a large enough example of an issue that's critically important, though. It's something that only effects a niche group, so to them, it's just further validation of their fake "oppression." It's concomitant to vacuous retards such as themselves to exclusively focus on their victimhood. The fanatics will always be the most difficult to convince; however, I don't think they're necessarily representative of the average voter/consumer who's really just more ignorant than passionate — the type who ignores such things and simply let's the TV decide. I'm not sure if I'm making sense, though. I have a bit of a migraine right now. You're certainly not wrong about their approach, but I feel like there's other factors in play that contribute in that particular situation. But who knows? Time will tell. Maybe they'll forever be ignorant of what's plainly obvious to everyone else who's not an ideologically obsessed activist.
Any sane and rational person would think mandating people get injected with experimental gene therapy would be a wakeup call for all of the idiots blindly following along, but apparently, they'd prefer to continue hitting the snooze button instead of waking the hell up.
Looking back, and maybe this is just my experience, I feel like one instance or event of it happening isn't enough for it to make anyone change their mind, honestly. A simple one off can be justified by just about anyone. They could easily tell themselves any number of lies as an excuse for why they're being censored/silenced. I feel that repetition is a very key part to people realizing what's taking place, and it's also what made many of us see the way things really are today. There was no singular event that was able to open our eyes to the mendacious nature of the prevaricators pushing propaganda. It was a series of events by politically-driven polemicists and activists who would profligately screech about victimhood and fake oppression ad infinitum in an attempt to divide everyone, push their agenda, and satiate their greed by pushing traffic to their outlet/site/channel. No matter how people called out their lies, sophistry, and apocryphal trash, they would would remain obdurate and simply toss labels at the person to discredit and silence them. Since they began, we've even seen them remove every comment section from all of their websites in order to keep people from calling them out as they were.
At the very least, I believe it's a multifaceted problem with many different groups and subgroups that will be affected. I just hope that people continue to show others the reality of how these corrupt media/tech companies operate.
We get it. You have a thesaurus
Cute, you actually think everyone needs a thesaurus as opposed to simply spending a large amount of time reading and having a broad lexicon.
Words exist to be used for the proper context. Literally none of the words I used are uncommon words when reading articles or books. If you took time, you'd probably notice I tend to use many of them quite commonly. Don't brag about being ignorant; it's silly. If something like that actually triggers you, it says vastly more about your own insecurities and need to vent your crippling depression on others.