"To show these filthy misogynists that won't let my kill a human life at foetal stage, I won't have sex and get pregnant with them!"
Accidental self-own.
And I write this as a pro choice under the "you can't be forced to continue carry someone against your will" argument. When the baby is viable outside, "aborting" it is murder.
C-section that "tresspasser" out at that point if the mother refuses to carry it further. Before that point of viability, it's lawful killing a human as per body autonomy. Key point : viable. So no "but muh ectopic pregnancy / mother too sick to carry" rebutal possible.
You're still comiting an atrocious act of selfishness though. Shame on you. Give the poor baby to adoption instead. No the child is not guilty and should not be executed for something the male genitor did.
I'm trying to think of how many times I've had them reply with great wrath and indignation whenever I've suggested that women should choose not to have sex if they don't want to get pregnant.
"To show these filthy misogynists that won't let my kill a human life at foetal stage, I won't have sex and get pregnant with them!"
Accidental self-own.
And I write this as a pro choice under the "you can't be forced to continue carry someone against your will" argument. When the baby is viable outside, "aborting" it is murder.
C-section that "tresspasser" out at that point if the mother refuses to carry it further. Before that point of viability, it's lawful killing a human as per body autonomy. Key point : viable. So no "but muh ectopic pregnancy / mother too sick to carry" rebutal possible.
You're still comiting an atrocious act of selfishness though. Shame on you. Give the poor baby to adoption instead. No the child is not guilty and should not be executed for something the male genitor did.
I'm trying to think of how many times I've had them reply with great wrath and indignation whenever I've suggested that women should choose not to have sex if they don't want to get pregnant.