While in the full video what she says make much more sense in context, she gets one very important thing incredibly wrong.
If for any reason the military was deployed in the US, to act against its citizens, that would be equivalent to the start of an all-out civil war.
In the event that a civil war did happen, what this "soldier" gets wildly incorrect is saying that the "good ol' boy system would not fare well at all."
At face value, to the uneducated retard that thinks solely "weapons vs weapons" it would most certainly appear that way on the surface; however, the truth of the matter is that should it ever come down to such an event happening, the Government would not stand a single chance in hell -- at all.
In fact, that would be a nightmare scenario all around for them.
Not that I think anyone is interested in the reasoning, so I'll spare the details and the time typing it -- unless someone was actually curious.
While in the full video what she says make much more sense in context, she gets one very important thing incredibly wrong.
If for any reason the military was deployed in the US, to act against its citizens, that would be equivalent to the start of an all-out civil war.
In the event that a civil war did happen, what this "soldier" gets wildly incorrect is saying that the "good ol' boy system would not fare well at all."
At face value, to the uneducated retard that thinks solely "weapons vs weapons" it would most certainly appear that way on the surface; however, the truth of the matter is that should it ever come down to such an event happening, the Government would not stand a single chance in hell -- at all.
In fact, that would be a nightmare scenario all around for them.
Not that I think anyone is interested in the reasoning, so I'll spare the details and the time typing it -- unless someone was actually curious.