Should be "Connecting the dots between Covid vaccine hesitancy and the general low quality of the vaccines". I took the vaccine months ago but at this point I don't think I could make the case that anyone who hasn't should, unless they are old in which case it's probably still a good idea.
unless they are old in which case it's probably still a good idea.
Even then it's not, as it's prone to cause pulmonary embolism, clotting, and fibromyalgia to name to a few. The biggest issue and reason you aren't seeing death tolls widely broadcast for old people is because they oftentimes have another co-morbidity (or several) that mask the problems endemic to the messengers getting into the bloodstream. So if you're old, people just chalk it up that your heart failure was due to being old, that the brain inflammation was due to some other medication, that the central nervous system degradation is due to being unhealthy, and that the thrombosis was probably some other medical complication.
Dr. Malone called this kind of phenomena "masking", because unfortunately old people who lived unhealthy lives typically have a lot of health issues, and so the complications caused by the vaccines are masked under those other complications.
Unfortunately, there is zero data available regarding efficacy in old people, since there have been no longitudinal studies done before these vaccines were made public.
We won't know what the Phase III clinical trial results will be like until 2023.
Maybe so, but it still will reduce the symptoms for old folks, which is about the only part of this SHILL vaccine that happens to work.
We do still have efficacy data, the drug companies had old people in their studies. it sounds like they are trying to rush the 'fda approval', but i dont think the fags can hack it.
Maybe so, but it still will reduce the symptoms for old folks, which is about the only part of this SHILL vaccine that happens to work.
Based on what? Where's your longitudinal, peer-reviewed control data?
Link me the study.
We do still have efficacy data, the drug companies had old people in their studies. it sounds like they are trying to rush the 'fda approval', but i dont think the fags can hack it.
So where's the literature so I can read what the efficacy data is for old people myself?
Should be "Connecting the dots between Covid vaccine hesitancy and the general low quality of the vaccines". I took the vaccine months ago but at this point I don't think I could make the case that anyone who hasn't should, unless they are old in which case it's probably still a good idea.
Even then it's not, as it's prone to cause pulmonary embolism, clotting, and fibromyalgia to name to a few. The biggest issue and reason you aren't seeing death tolls widely broadcast for old people is because they oftentimes have another co-morbidity (or several) that mask the problems endemic to the messengers getting into the bloodstream. So if you're old, people just chalk it up that your heart failure was due to being old, that the brain inflammation was due to some other medication, that the central nervous system degradation is due to being unhealthy, and that the thrombosis was probably some other medical complication.
Dr. Malone called this kind of phenomena "masking", because unfortunately old people who lived unhealthy lives typically have a lot of health issues, and so the complications caused by the vaccines are masked under those other complications.
Unfortunately, there is zero data available regarding efficacy in old people, since there have been no longitudinal studies done before these vaccines were made public.
We won't know what the Phase III clinical trial results will be like until 2023.
Maybe so, but it still will reduce the symptoms for old folks, which is about the only part of this SHILL vaccine that happens to work.
We do still have efficacy data, the drug companies had old people in their studies. it sounds like they are trying to rush the 'fda approval', but i dont think the fags can hack it.
Based on what? Where's your longitudinal, peer-reviewed control data?
Link me the study.
So where's the literature so I can read what the efficacy data is for old people myself?
I agree. The propo is just too much, though. its sad how easily retards turn into Nazis