In 1993 there were no 50 year old Kalashnikovs. Also actually they did what they went for (along with the French and the Canadians), but then withdrew the Marines and left only some Rangers and friends to work with the Paki UN child molesters.
1934 NFA, the Failed 1938 NFA, Miller,
and the Regulation of Gun Parts
By Dean Weingarten. February 27, 2020
Progressives used the Miller case to claim the Second Amendment did not protect an individual right. Progressive judges appointed by FDR and Truman came to dominate the federal appeals courts.
U.S. v. Miller was used to prevent challenges to the NFA of 1938. While Miller clearly implied that military arms were protected by the Second Amendment, FDR appointed judges ruled it did not.
In Cases v. United States, 1942, a three judge panel on the First Circuit ruled it was unlikely Miller meant military arms were protected by the Second Amendment: From Cases:
In 1993 there were no 50 year old Kalashnikovs. Also actually they did what they went for (along with the French and the Canadians), but then withdrew the Marines and left only some Rangers and friends to work with the Paki UN child molesters.
I believe America's downfall began with the tyrant Franklin D. Roosevelt.
1933: Executive Order 6102 'forbidding hoarding of gold'
1934: “New Deal for Crime” National Firearms Act of 1934
1942: Executive Order 9066, Japanese internment camps
These were un-free and un-American. Yet America accepted this bullshit.
https://archive.ph/MZCie http://jpfo.org/articles-2020/1934-nfa-failed-1938-nfa-miller.htm