Surely, giving attention to a murder committed by a given group is not the same as being biased against that group.
Not necessarily, but there's a reason we've got a David Dorn memorial but not a Philando Castile memorial and it's because we've got a lot more contempt for Dorn's killer than we do for Castile's, and a lot more respect for Dorn than we have for Castile.
Eh, as they view it, mere criticism is hate - to the point that they had to redefine most of the biased hate words to stop themselves getting caught in their own trap.
Really shows how good-faith they are when they re-define hateful conduct so that it doesn't apply to their targets.
That's not bias. That's just facts. But that was not my point. My point is that you need not be biased against a given group to point out a murder committed by a member of that group.
If we were to define Marxist as a race, sure.
Not even then. Surely, giving attention to a murder committed by a given group is not the same as being biased against that group.
Not necessarily, but there's a reason we've got a David Dorn memorial but not a Philando Castile memorial and it's because we've got a lot more contempt for Dorn's killer than we do for Castile's, and a lot more respect for Dorn than we have for Castile.
Eh, as they view it, mere criticism is hate - to the point that they had to redefine most of the biased hate words to stop themselves getting caught in their own trap.
Really shows how good-faith they are when they re-define hateful conduct so that it doesn't apply to their targets.
That's not bias. That's just facts. But that was not my point. My point is that you need not be biased against a given group to point out a murder committed by a member of that group.
Sub-species really.