I know some of you degenerates still believe that civil rights can be obtained through civil disobedience. This is a lie of optics you have been sold. Let’s start with women’s suffrage, women were given the right to vote with no responsibilities attached not because it was humanitarian, but because this was the birth time of consumerism and propagandists like Bernaise knew that women controlled purchasing power even then. This was an action taken by government to empower government. Next we have the civil rights act, which was entirely about equal rights of course! Except it wasnt, much like today’s “civil rights” it was about decreasing the power and wealth of the middle class. This is why we got “the great new society” that stripped wealth from citizens to fund government programs. At the exact same time we also got the Hart-Cellar act to divide the American populace and destroy western culture. Next we have second wave feminism which had one purpose, mass influx of the workforce and the 2 income household. This was done to mimic the soviets who found great success in letting women be uninhibited because it destroyed family ties and even had mother’s view their children as objects. There has never been an actual act of mass civil disobedience in America that led to a more United and free populace, it has always been “rights” in exchange for power and loss of control of oneself. Everyone already knows what the real answer to a corrupt government is, just as our founding fathers did, the difference is our weak populace would rather be sheep than wolves.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
All historical popular uprisings were driven by elites.
Medieval peasant uprisings too?
Spartacus revolt in Rome?
Tambov Rebellion?
I could go on and on with that.
Well maybe just since the French Revolution.
I already said Tambov.