Yeah definitely.
One is pictures and videos of people having sex or in sexual positions! And the other one is…. pictures and videos of people having sex or in sexual positions (but they own the means of production).
Real hot take you have here, man. OF and Porn are literally the same, just only fans is the commodification of porn to the point where average women now take part in it. Lowered the barrier to entry.
With porn, there's no illusion that Mia Khalifa will give you any attention, you're just a passive viewer. Even if you pay for a subscription, none of these women will ever care about you and that's logical.
With OF, it's built on two psychological concepts, the idea that people are more attached to something they have and give it higher value (same concept Netflix operates on, subscriptions that never get canceled because the human mind hates giving things up.), and the concept of false interaction, or a "girlfriend experience".
Soul sucking and life destroying? Since when did porn make you get married?
Realistically, people just use it to satisfy urges and move on with life. Porn addiction is a debunked radfem conspiracy theory.
Banning it would cause an epidemic of worthless women getting rich through exploiting the lack of it, and likely political power too through all the simping.
There's a clear difference between the two.
Yeah definitely. One is pictures and videos of people having sex or in sexual positions! And the other one is…. pictures and videos of people having sex or in sexual positions (but they own the means of production).
Real hot take you have here, man. OF and Porn are literally the same, just only fans is the commodification of porn to the point where average women now take part in it. Lowered the barrier to entry.
That's not the only difference.
With porn, there's no illusion that Mia Khalifa will give you any attention, you're just a passive viewer. Even if you pay for a subscription, none of these women will ever care about you and that's logical.
With OF, it's built on two psychological concepts, the idea that people are more attached to something they have and give it higher value (same concept Netflix operates on, subscriptions that never get canceled because the human mind hates giving things up.), and the concept of false interaction, or a "girlfriend experience".
So a more apt comparison would be heroin vs fentanyl.
Homie they’re both still soul sucking, life destroying drugs. It’s not a difference in kind, merely degree.
I don't agree with that.
Soul sucking and life destroying? Since when did porn make you get married?
Realistically, people just use it to satisfy urges and move on with life. Porn addiction is a debunked radfem conspiracy theory.
Banning it would cause an epidemic of worthless women getting rich through exploiting the lack of it, and likely political power too through all the simping.
Onlyfans relies on a twisted parasocial relationship where men delude themselves into thinking it's a good replacement for a real relationship.
You don't get anything like that from watching Backdoor Sluts 9.