Makes me wonder…
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
He only wanted the at risk to take them, who have the best chance of getting a good result.
Most of the deaths and severe injuries have been in people too young to be realistic candidates for the vaccine.
We don't actually know that. That's the problem. Older people dying from the vaccine is usually masked under other morbidities, This is what Dr. Malone was trying to get across: how do you know an old person who got a vaccine and died of a blood clot didn't die from a blood clot brought about by the vaccine?
With the health authorities and government covering up all the deaths and not tracking vaccine-related deaths, there's no way to know how many old people are dying from the shots.
If you're old and have a lung condition, they would simply put it down that you may have died from asthma; if you suffered from some other chronic illness and got the vaccine, they would simply put down on your death certificate that the other illness killed you.
With zero data on the actual death rates, especially those older than 65, we literally have no idea what the efficacy is for old people.
But if it's causing such severe and adverse effects in young people, the bigger question is: why wouldn't it cause similar effects once the spike protein gets into the bloodstream of an older person with a comorbidity?
I think that’s why looking and comparing the no comorbidity COVID deaths vs no comorbidity deaths of this that got the Experimental gene therapy stab in ages under 30.
Still sourcing the data, but it seems the stab is killing ALOT more in that age range. And, to me, that’s really telling.