Because your analysis promotes the Marxist concept of Surplus Value, which is based on another Marxist and Socialist set of ideas involving Objective Value of Goods, and the Labor Theory of Value.
The very concept of Surplus Value asserts that there is an objective value to a thing identified by some Socialist Pseudo-Intellectual, and that the Surplus Value gained from that thing (known to the rest of the planet as profit), is inherently exploitative to the Laborers who built that thing. Hence all Surplus Value is exploitation, and all market forces where profit is earned is "exploitation" by "Capitalists" who are hording surplus value.
I am not. Why would anyone think that I am?
Because your analysis promotes the Marxist concept of Surplus Value, which is based on another Marxist and Socialist set of ideas involving Objective Value of Goods, and the Labor Theory of Value.
The very concept of Surplus Value asserts that there is an objective value to a thing identified by some Socialist Pseudo-Intellectual, and that the Surplus Value gained from that thing (known to the rest of the planet as profit), is inherently exploitative to the Laborers who built that thing. Hence all Surplus Value is exploitation, and all market forces where profit is earned is "exploitation" by "Capitalists" who are hording surplus value.
I am discussing socialism in socialist terms, call it surplus value or profit, the analysis is the same.