You are correct. Just because it's the same argument structure but opposite doesn't mean I must be wrong because leftists are wrong. In a war, of course both opposing sides will say the exact opposite thing but reversed to favour their side. That is expected. The winning side usually creates the reality in which they are right. You taking the 3rd position as promoting liberty and race neutrality over authoritarianism and race reality doesn't make you any better. It's just another perspective. I would be fine with liberty and race neutrality if I thought it was capable of leading to a better outcome but I do not believe it is. Ideally, perhaps but given the current realities of society, it isn't workable.
Liberty doesn't work because the power differential between organized well-financed forces and unorganized not so well-financed forces is far too high in modern society. That means all societies will converge to authoritarianism. I would rather have an authoritative government that serves my interests. Ideally, I prefer liberty but the reality is liberty cannot happen right now. 1700s-1800s liberty focused western society happened because the first industrial revolution reduced the differential between well-financed organized forces and not so well-financed unorganized forces. This led to more individualism and liberty, which was good and I like that but I understand modern society does not have these factors in play anymore. Authoritarianism will reign supreme in the end until the situation changes again.
Race neutrality doesn't work because it is a total denial of reality. Race neutrality always leads to race realism because you can only deny reality for so long before the truth starts to seep in.
Jews aren't Aryan, even if you want to call them Caucasian. For whatever it's worth, they are different at a racial level than what most people consider to be White (not including Jews).
You are wrong, just like the SJWs who claim the same thing against whites. If I ask them to provide evidence that whites control everything, they will throw a huge list of actual white people in power. If I ask the same thing, you will provide the same thing with Jews. Maybe, perhaps, these people worked their ass off to be where they are? Maybe part of the hatred against Jews comes from very old blood libel? Like, for instance, only Jews were allowed to lend money in the middle ages, and now the stereotype of Jews loving money comes from this? Hating Jews is the same thing as hating whites. The hate comes from the exact same place.
Jews are an ethnicity of caucasians. Just like Germans are, Scandinavians are, just like Italians are.
White people have about the expected amount of power given their representation and arguably less power than they ought to given that western civilization is based on white people. Jews have a disproportionate amount of power.
The reasons for that is historical and racial. Due to circumstances, Jews took up different professions than whites. These professions are professions that are vastly more important today in modern society than historically. Jews also apparently have racial characteristics which make them excel at these professions.
I am not against the fact that Jews have a disproportionate amount of power. I am against how the Jews use this power. My argument is that Jews have a racial tendency to use their power in a manner counter to the interests of white people. Arguably, because white people's power is more evenly spread, while Jews have specialized dominance in certain areas, the ways in which Jewish power manifests in a society is much different because of racial differences and this difference in specialized power. My argument is that our outcome as a society would be better if the people in power were white because the outcomes overall of white people would be a better benefit to society as a whole than the outcomes Jews push for using their power.
Again, I would have no problem with Jews if the Jews with power didn't use their power in a manner that doesn't align with what I consider to be good. You can make the argument that replacing Jews with white people would lead to the same outcome. I disagree because of the racial differences. Do you believe if we replaced all white people with black people our society would look identical or do you accept due to racial differences with black people, that leads to differences in culture? Culture is downstream of race.
I'm not denying Jews are XYZ. Categories are simply that, categories for differentiating people. Jews are different than non-Jew whites at a racial level and whatever you call them is irrelevant as long as we separate them out.
You are correct. Just because it's the same argument structure but opposite doesn't mean I must be wrong because leftists are wrong. In a war, of course both opposing sides will say the exact opposite thing but reversed to favour their side. That is expected. The winning side usually creates the reality in which they are right. You taking the 3rd position as promoting liberty and race neutrality over authoritarianism and race reality doesn't make you any better. It's just another perspective. I would be fine with liberty and race neutrality if I thought it was capable of leading to a better outcome but I do not believe it is. Ideally, perhaps but given the current realities of society, it isn't workable.
Liberty doesn't work because the power differential between organized well-financed forces and unorganized not so well-financed forces is far too high in modern society. That means all societies will converge to authoritarianism. I would rather have an authoritative government that serves my interests. Ideally, I prefer liberty but the reality is liberty cannot happen right now. 1700s-1800s liberty focused western society happened because the first industrial revolution reduced the differential between well-financed organized forces and not so well-financed unorganized forces. This led to more individualism and liberty, which was good and I like that but I understand modern society does not have these factors in play anymore. Authoritarianism will reign supreme in the end until the situation changes again.
Race neutrality doesn't work because it is a total denial of reality. Race neutrality always leads to race realism because you can only deny reality for so long before the truth starts to seep in.
Jews aren't Aryan, even if you want to call them Caucasian. For whatever it's worth, they are different at a racial level than what most people consider to be White (not including Jews).
You are wrong, just like the SJWs who claim the same thing against whites. If I ask them to provide evidence that whites control everything, they will throw a huge list of actual white people in power. If I ask the same thing, you will provide the same thing with Jews. Maybe, perhaps, these people worked their ass off to be where they are? Maybe part of the hatred against Jews comes from very old blood libel? Like, for instance, only Jews were allowed to lend money in the middle ages, and now the stereotype of Jews loving money comes from this? Hating Jews is the same thing as hating whites. The hate comes from the exact same place.
Jews are an ethnicity of caucasians. Just like Germans are, Scandinavians are, just like Italians are.
White people have about the expected amount of power given their representation and arguably less power than they ought to given that western civilization is based on white people. Jews have a disproportionate amount of power.
The reasons for that is historical and racial. Due to circumstances, Jews took up different professions than whites. These professions are professions that are vastly more important today in modern society than historically. Jews also apparently have racial characteristics which make them excel at these professions.
I am not against the fact that Jews have a disproportionate amount of power. I am against how the Jews use this power. My argument is that Jews have a racial tendency to use their power in a manner counter to the interests of white people. Arguably, because white people's power is more evenly spread, while Jews have specialized dominance in certain areas, the ways in which Jewish power manifests in a society is much different because of racial differences and this difference in specialized power. My argument is that our outcome as a society would be better if the people in power were white because the outcomes overall of white people would be a better benefit to society as a whole than the outcomes Jews push for using their power.
Again, I would have no problem with Jews if the Jews with power didn't use their power in a manner that doesn't align with what I consider to be good. You can make the argument that replacing Jews with white people would lead to the same outcome. I disagree because of the racial differences. Do you believe if we replaced all white people with black people our society would look identical or do you accept due to racial differences with black people, that leads to differences in culture? Culture is downstream of race.
I'm not denying Jews are XYZ. Categories are simply that, categories for differentiating people. Jews are different than non-Jew whites at a racial level and whatever you call them is irrelevant as long as we separate them out.
Whites have a disproportionate amount of power.
got any citations for that?
And the vast disproportionate amount of whites holding power and using their power in a manner counter to the interests of whites?
Quoting you for later, in case you somehow aren't banned from this board. This is all anyone needs to see, to know exactly what you are.