And they say the slippery slope is a fallacy
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
Slippery slope isn't real, because it presumes that the escalation is a consequence of the initial concession and not just the true end goal.
To put this into an example that I know very well - women's vote didn't lead to what we have now because of the slippery slope - it was because their true intentions were hidden to get their initial successes. Now that they are firmly entrenched and hold a large amount of power, they can be more open about their end game.
that is exactly what slippery slope refers to; give devil a finger and it takes whole hand; give in even a little, and you will loose it all
That's not what it refers to, they always theme it around a continuing decline in values.
In reality, if we didn't have feminist sympathizers agitating on behalf of every group known to man, the slippery slope wouldn't be true at all.
Gays wanted to marry, they didn't want the whole alphabet mafia. Women wanted this, because it helped dehumanize men.
Race relations were fine before women's groups poisoned the well with White Privilege and BLM.
Every single group that's cited as a proof of the slippery slope is just a group that walked away from their own fight because it was won and let feminists take over.
and that is because feminists had first success, so they went for next success, and then next ,and then taking next successes on behalf of others because there werent any other successes for them to claim; all on marxist movement; and as slippery slope, slope to continue falling on, it wont stop until full marxist utopia is set in (theme of movement since start never was equality, it was always crush the current norms)