This does not surprise Professor Collis Machoko, a renowned academic on the topic.
The objections are "about control," he told the BBC. "African societies are not ready for true equality. We don't know what to do with women we cannot control."
That this is the second and third paragraph is more interesting than this whole proposal, which will surely go nowhere. Renowned academic? Surely, you are joking. And nice slam at 'African societies'. It's funny that the radical left everywhere is trying to destroy society from within, whether in Europe, America or Africa.
The entire article is littered with quotes from this raving imbecile.
Businessman and TV personality Musa Mseleku - who has four wives - is among those opposed to polyandry.
"This will destroy African culture. What about the children of those people? How will they know their identity?" asks Mr Mseleku, who stars in a South African reality TV show about his polygamous family.
I mean, while polygamy is a great evil and a relic of barbarism, he is not wrong about this.
Prof Machoko said he was unaware of polyandrous marriages in South Africa. Nevertheless, gender rights activists have asked the government to legalise such unions in the interest of equality and choice, as the law currently permits a man to take more than one wife.
If your right arm is infected and at risk of amputation, the response is not to amputate your left arm in the interests of equality so called, but to try to heal your right arm.
Is the "misogyny" argument being used against Africans proof that none of this is about race and the reason that there seems to be a racial component in leftist ideology is simply because of voting demographics?
I think race, like gender, is a cover. In that they are not actually trying to ensure the well-being of people based on either gender or race, no more than the white supremacists of old were trying to ensure the well-being of whites rather than their political advantage.
I don't agree with that, I think it's clear that whatever elite is actually running the show wants women to be above men. But yes, race is definitely a cover, and the white nationalists fall for it every time.
That this is the second and third paragraph is more interesting than this whole proposal, which will surely go nowhere. Renowned academic? Surely, you are joking. And nice slam at 'African societies'. It's funny that the radical left everywhere is trying to destroy society from within, whether in Europe, America or Africa.
The entire article is littered with quotes from this raving imbecile.
I mean, while polygamy is a great evil and a relic of barbarism, he is not wrong about this.
If your right arm is infected and at risk of amputation, the response is not to amputate your left arm in the interests of equality so called, but to try to heal your right arm.
Is the "misogyny" argument being used against Africans proof that none of this is about race and the reason that there seems to be a racial component in leftist ideology is simply because of voting demographics?
I think race, like gender, is a cover. In that they are not actually trying to ensure the well-being of people based on either gender or race, no more than the white supremacists of old were trying to ensure the well-being of whites rather than their political advantage.
I don't agree with that, I think it's clear that whatever elite is actually running the show wants women to be above men. But yes, race is definitely a cover, and the white nationalists fall for it every time.
Interestingly mao was often portrayed as motherly. There is a line in authoritarian leftist thought that is matriarchal