Fukushima? Can that even be called a disaster for nuclear energy? It needed TWO natural disasters at the same time and even then, it's not like it went critical and exploded.
Plus, just like Chernobyl but to a lesser extent, it was also built and maintained in a less than ideal way. It was built in a location that was lower in altitude than recommended, by something like 10 meters. I also think I read some stuff that said it had poor maintenance reports but I'm less sure of that
Fukushima? Can that even be called a disaster for nuclear energy? It needed TWO natural disasters at the same time and even then, it's not like it went critical and exploded.
Plus, just like Chernobyl but to a lesser extent, it was also built and maintained in a less than ideal way. It was built in a location that was lower in altitude than recommended, by something like 10 meters. I also think I read some stuff that said it had poor maintenance reports but I'm less sure of that