If lying by omission is your way to "appease" the normalfags, I feel sorry and fear for the future. Is your stupid take on optics matters more than telling the truth? Are you still thinking that you can live a life built on comforting lies than the uncomfortable truth? Shameful.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
I've been "studying" CRT in different forms, primarily watching videos on both sides (for and against) ...
CRT has a core that sounds reasonable, but everything surrounding it is basically snake oil salesman bullshit. The core of it is just attempting to draw a causality between historical events and current day "inequalities". There is something to be said about generational wealth, that does exist, and similarly, there could be said that there is generational poverty that people inherit (e.g. poor people don't get educated as much, so they pass on bad ideas to their children and those bad ideas hold them back, and the cycle continues).
Notice how I didn't have to invoke race in that explanation. I have seen many debates on this, and when pressed hard on the matter, the CRT proponents will try to blurr the connection in regards to race. The part where race comes in, is because of the historical analysis seen through a particular lense that demonizes only "white" Europeans.
They start layring a bunch of bullshit on this seemingly reasonable assumption that there is something to be said about inheriting wealth or poverty, and then the popular version just lays on top that it's "white supremacy's" fault. Then they jump through hoops, and do all kinds of tricks to just keep the blame on the mythical "whiteness".
Anyone who studies history enough can tell you it is much more complicated than "whites" going around conquering shit, although there was a time where this did happen, and people were definitely proper racist to a great extent. That is besides the point however, because nobody can really prove the direct causal link going so far back hundreds of years. Instead the real line of causality is communism, which started with Hegel, followed by Marx, then a bunch of other "philosophers" (more like marxist assholes) during the 20th century. This line of thinking is the one that keeps referring back to how history is still at play, and this line of thinking is the one being packaged by modern day communist because they are such hateful assholes they only want to destroy, and do so in the sneakiest possible way.
Right, even that core assumption is already on shaky ground. There is at least some reason to it,but I don't think it goes past a few generations though, and even then you need a very specific lense to trace back specific lineages instead of talkign about entire groups of cultures and races.
Yeah the left trying to insert race in everything is beyond annoying. They want so badly to cling to racism because it's one of the main pillars of their party. Racism is what keeps their voters voting for them and they will find racism where there is none. The left can't afford for racism to die. Maybe at some point they will finally shift their racism agenda to economic class.
The way they do things now is very confusing because instead of saying poor or under developed they just say black. You have black families that make millions of dollars every year. Black doctors, lawyers, ex-presidents. Oprah makes more in a year than I will ever see in my life. Is that because she's black and I'm white? Should she be forced to give me some of that money because of the obvious racism in that she is a different race than I am and she is worth more money so racism must be the cause.
"Anyone who studies history enough can tell you"
anyone who studies history, AT ALL, can tell you where critical race theory came from, what the purpose of it is. It is a cynical attack strategy on western culture by jewish communists that moved from frankfurt germany to new york in the early 20th century. They setup shop in a local new york university and spread their poison throughout the education system. The goal has always been global communism. white people resisted, and for this great sin they must be destroyed.
Damn you pegged it so well. Great post.
Because purely economic Marxism failed.
Marxist socialism, the Soviet union failed, so a salty Antonio Gramsci wrote how to destabilize a country via subverting religion and institutions to stop capitalism.
https://rumble.com/vdkykf-the-ideas-driving-bidens-lunacy.-james-lindsay-with-sebastian-gorka.html
Then in America there was Herbert Marcuse, Kimberlé Crenshaw and Combahee River Collective injecting race into Gramsci, getting to Critical Legal Studies, then Critical Race Theory.
https://archive.ph/vZLzq https:// lpeproject. org/blog/politics-in-of-and-through-the-legal-academy-akbar-interviews-mastuda-part-1/
https:// www. youtube. com/watch?v=oxYqqhNdP2s
Yes, excellent details, thanks for sharing the links.
I want you to tell that to every refugees of the Soviet Union, Cuba, China, Vietnam, North Korea and Venezuela. They'll have some choice words with you.
Not sure what you mean. That is not my quote, right? I don't think i wrote that, so I wouldn't be telling that to anyone.
The thing is, at it's most fundamental, most basic level, communism as presented isn't some horrific nightmare fuel.
It's presented as "wouldn't it be nice if we helped people less well-off than ourselves". But it never stays there, because communists don't value morals and so have no problem at all lying to get what they want.