If lying by omission is your way to "appease" the normalfags, I feel sorry and fear for the future. Is your stupid take on optics matters more than telling the truth? Are you still thinking that you can live a life built on comforting lies than the uncomfortable truth? Shameful.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
Who are you talking to?
THe only person I've seen argue what he is talking about is Styxnhammer. I don't even know why I still watch that smug fuck's videos. Youtube just keeps suggesting them and I keep thinking he might have something interesting to say but at the end of the video I just keep thinking this guy has no right to be so smug and cocky.
hey guys I know I look like a sjw lesbian who just became a conservative literally 9 months ago, but let me lecture you on how to be a conservative
why would anyone with any sense care what a women has to say about politics?
She's married to a Mexican of dubious legal status.
I thought it's eastern European of dubious legal status
Someone here said Mexican and trolls in her chat kept saying Mexican as well.
Who the fuck cares about this person?
Glowies?
¯\_ (ツ)_/¯
I've been "studying" CRT in different forms, primarily watching videos on both sides (for and against) ...
CRT has a core that sounds reasonable, but everything surrounding it is basically snake oil salesman bullshit. The core of it is just attempting to draw a causality between historical events and current day "inequalities". There is something to be said about generational wealth, that does exist, and similarly, there could be said that there is generational poverty that people inherit (e.g. poor people don't get educated as much, so they pass on bad ideas to their children and those bad ideas hold them back, and the cycle continues).
Notice how I didn't have to invoke race in that explanation. I have seen many debates on this, and when pressed hard on the matter, the CRT proponents will try to blurr the connection in regards to race. The part where race comes in, is because of the historical analysis seen through a particular lense that demonizes only "white" Europeans.
They start layring a bunch of bullshit on this seemingly reasonable assumption that there is something to be said about inheriting wealth or poverty, and then the popular version just lays on top that it's "white supremacy's" fault. Then they jump through hoops, and do all kinds of tricks to just keep the blame on the mythical "whiteness".
Anyone who studies history enough can tell you it is much more complicated than "whites" going around conquering shit, although there was a time where this did happen, and people were definitely proper racist to a great extent. That is besides the point however, because nobody can really prove the direct causal link going so far back hundreds of years. Instead the real line of causality is communism, which started with Hegel, followed by Marx, then a bunch of other "philosophers" (more like marxist assholes) during the 20th century. This line of thinking is the one that keeps referring back to how history is still at play, and this line of thinking is the one being packaged by modern day communist because they are such hateful assholes they only want to destroy, and do so in the sneakiest possible way.
Right, even that core assumption is already on shaky ground. There is at least some reason to it,but I don't think it goes past a few generations though, and even then you need a very specific lense to trace back specific lineages instead of talkign about entire groups of cultures and races.
Yeah the left trying to insert race in everything is beyond annoying. They want so badly to cling to racism because it's one of the main pillars of their party. Racism is what keeps their voters voting for them and they will find racism where there is none. The left can't afford for racism to die. Maybe at some point they will finally shift their racism agenda to economic class.
The way they do things now is very confusing because instead of saying poor or under developed they just say black. You have black families that make millions of dollars every year. Black doctors, lawyers, ex-presidents. Oprah makes more in a year than I will ever see in my life. Is that because she's black and I'm white? Should she be forced to give me some of that money because of the obvious racism in that she is a different race than I am and she is worth more money so racism must be the cause.
"Anyone who studies history enough can tell you"
anyone who studies history, AT ALL, can tell you where critical race theory came from, what the purpose of it is. It is a cynical attack strategy on western culture by jewish communists that moved from frankfurt germany to new york in the early 20th century. They setup shop in a local new york university and spread their poison throughout the education system. The goal has always been global communism. white people resisted, and for this great sin they must be destroyed.
I've tried to tell Karlyn that her pleas fall on deaf ears, because when CRT is applied in meat space, it is belligerently anti-white. Why? The people teaching CRT have lost the nuance that academic CRT has, which is that "white" is not referring to a demographic group, but is more a set of behavioral norms. CRT uses all kinds of words that have the definitions changed, like all Marxists do, every time, without fail, and whiteness is one of those altered words.
CRT when applied in a grade school classroom, by a 105 IQ teacher, comes across as straight up anti-white hatred. Talk to a white kid who is exposed to it, they will tell you.
Furthermore, one must consider the rhetorical aspect of the term. Anti-white is a near perfect rhetorical weapon to use on the woke left. It makes them play defense, first off, and pisses them off, because to deny the claim is defending CRT, and in doing so the woke outs themselves as anti-white.
This is the most retarded thing I've ever heard, almost as retarded as Marxists assuming white = oppressor.
"White-ness" a special magic property that makes anyone they don't like white.
Everybody has a secret Hitler lurking inside them. It is known.
https://archive.ph/b3LgX https://web.archive.org/web/20210509151127/https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12iNitkz48/the-hitlertopia-interpretation-o/c/ https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12iNitkz48/the-hitlertopia-interpretation-o/c/
96 I'd believe, sometimes.
Yeah, sure. But if you change "white" to the name of any other race or ethnic group, it's unambiguously racist. But no, it's just that "whiteness" is an abstract concept unrelated to race.
I didn't say that made make sense, or that it was consistent, but "white" is reduced to a nebulous concept in their literature.
Nothing about critical theory makes sense or is consistent, let alone CRT, and I think the people trying to corral all discussion in opposition to it into using CRT terminology as defined by CRT cultists is fatally flawed.
CRT is neonazi ideology with evil jews swapped with evil whites.
haha the commie's projecting again
Tribe > ideology. The only racial demographic that doesn't treat democracy as a racial referendum is whites, and that only happens because they've been subjected to a century of rabidly anti-white propaganda.
The ruling elites that you focus on so pathogically? They will not defeat China. Because the Chinese don't care if anyone thinks they're racist.
You're operating from an outdated mindset.
Who are they being racist against?
c.. c... conservatives!