I couldn't find 5000, but I did find this representative sample that goes from 3 to around 4600 with some big jumps in between. The first few honestly don't look that attractive to me, but the later ones were definitely quite ugly.
Seems to overly prioritize tall and skinny.
The 100s have plenty of girls that are cuter imo but not as tall and thin as the top scorers.
Around 4000+ they seem to be either genuinely ugly, fat, or androgynous. The androgynous ones come off as attractive relative to their direct competition to me. I'm sure tomboys in baggy jeans hold more appeal than whatever system this is giving them. (Though maybe a chubby chaser might be saying the same about the fat ones.)
I couldn't find 5000, but I did find this representative sample that goes from 3 to around 4600 with some big jumps in between. The first few honestly don't look that attractive to me, but the later ones were definitely quite ugly.
https://v.qq.com/x/page/v0545i47ax3.html
Seems to overly prioritize tall and skinny. The 100s have plenty of girls that are cuter imo but not as tall and thin as the top scorers.
Around 4000+ they seem to be either genuinely ugly, fat, or androgynous. The androgynous ones come off as attractive relative to their direct competition to me. I'm sure tomboys in baggy jeans hold more appeal than whatever system this is giving them. (Though maybe a chubby chaser might be saying the same about the fat ones.)