If Christianity gets wiped off from the West, of course it's going to be replaced by "science, logic and reason", which brings us to what is going on in our world. No masks, no jabs, you're not part of the cult, you're a heretic!
Now you're seeing the world that the likes of Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, Carl Benjamin, TJ Kincade, Vee and many other Youtube skeptics and atheists have been building for decades. Do you still want to live in this world where "science, logic and reason" replaced Christianity?
Science, logic, and reason are tools for understanding the universe. They do not provide meaning the way religion does. But the idea of "Science" has been turned into a cult by fools who don't understand that they don't understand what science is, but think they're smarter than all those dumb religious rubes.
People with no self-awareness will always be susceptible to cult-like behavior.
I realized this years ago, when perusing r/atheism, and seeing a group that was just as dogmatic, bigoted, and intolerant (and often far more hateful) as the religious people they constantly mocked.
If you don't learn how to think, you will be told what to think, and you won't have the cognitive tools to reject bad ideas. This is the road towards a new dark age of superstition, tribalism, and violence, and it is a road we are clearly heading down right now.
The atheism movement of r/atheism fell to the SJW before GG. At about 2 years in the IRL conferences had them stating their privileges before speaking.
People have been using using "science" for decades (if not more) to bash people and force their opinion. "99% of scientists," ya-da-yah-da. It's consensus building based on pressure rather than understanding. It's a tool to characterize their opponents, and address themselves as in the right, while silencing the debate and exploration that is required for actual science and discovery. If you question, then you're a crackpot, because "99%" believes, and if a scientist disagrees, then they left 1% open for them.
If people actually cared, they'd explore the full issues surrounding the problem, and come up with a solution that best addresses them, rather than ramrodding something through that will only cause further issues. That, and the "environmental" issue has been used as a communist front for decades. It always ended up being about redistributing wealth. China's benefited greatly as it's exempt from carbon pricing, so it's now producing as much as every developed country combined, while producing those same countries products. The product gets made anyway, but you're not punished if you make it in China. If there was legitimacy, this would have been prevented before the world drowned the time before last.
/rant