So I've been loosely following the current conflict transpiring over in the east and yet I'm still confused about why every media outlet is completely shilling for Palestine.
So from my understanding the Palestinians figured out if they fire a crapload of rockets at one spot they have a higher chance of getting through the iron Dome (which looks spectacular and scary at night) and several days ago they killed a few Israelis in the process.
So why is it when some Palestinians get killed by similar circumstances, airstrike not random firing rockets there's articles everywhere about it?
If they're all ran/owned by Jews I would've thought it'd be the opposite way, them all shilling for Israel.
Yes, they are. Why would anybody try to resist their land being taken from them? Just let everything you have be taken from you and everything will be peaceful. I'm sure you will feel the same when your home is being looted. Especially if the robbers are being supported by the tune of billions of dollars.
There's no such thing as Palestine. When Israel became a nation again post WWII, the Arab nations around them all attacked. They convinced many of their people to move to the area outside of Israel because once they destroyed Israel there would be free housing and land for the taking. When Israel kicked their asses, those nations would not allow the 'land for the taking' fools to come back home. Now they're called Palestinians. The only reason they are there or even exist is to destroy Israel and take the land. There is absolutely no scenario where Israel is the aggressor here. If Israel wanted, they could wipe out these folks in about two days. The fact that they mostly leave them alone while absorbing constant attacks is really just mind boggling.
Firstly it was the British who established Mandatory Palestine as part of the Balfour agreement. Of course there would not be any recognized state due to the Mandate for Palestine from the League of Nations.
"If Israel wanted, they could wipe out these folks in about two days."
Then give one legitimate reason why they would not do so, if they could solve the issue so quickly. Or perhaps they benefit from the constant conflict, by acting as a means of funneling money from the US for political purposes.
They probably don’t wipe them out because they are in fact not a genocidal state, and would be just fine living alongside them if they stopped launching rockets at the country.
You seriously want me to tell you why they won't commit genocide?
And they get victim points in case the holocaust white guilt starts to wewr off.
Has there ever been a Palestinian State?
Their have been many people in history quoted talking about was Israel was like in the 18th and 19th century. Mark Twain called it desolate with hardly a shrub in the country, and that Jerusalem had only 4000 inhabitants. Historically, some if these inhabitants were already Jewish.
Do some research into this topic, there are many reinforcing documents, dont just trust the mainstream narrative.
To some extent, there is an appearance that Israel provokes the moslems into acting in self-defeat. That they keep falling for it is how things have become as they are today.
Question: Is the Palestinian strategy of firing rockets at Israel yielding wins or losses? Should one continue a losing strategy no matter what?
No one wants the jews to continue existing, but the fucking Palestinians keep making themselves so retardedly unlikable that people end up rooting for the jews anyway. That's just the reality of the situation.
I don't know if this is really the jew strategy, but it sure looks plausible.
To paraphrase Jimmy Carr; Hey, I toned it down for you!
Do you not think that strategy is plausible? Israel is a small country, and they rake in 3-6 billion dollars per year because of this.