After an incident where anti-loli false flaggots got an account wrongfully banned for cp, ottman decided to ban loli by making false arguments similar to what 8chan owner jim watkins and gab owner andrew torba made.
Minds userbase is having none of it, and are actively calling ottman out for lying while demanding this decision be reversed.
new edit: ottman is having a meltdown, calling people bots and deleting posts.
edit: the mods need to consider banning the anti-loli spergs on this site for pointless infighting.
No, the people like the Minds guy whose "free speech" idea changes depending on the topic at hand to circle back to the original issue. I can trust Antonio to begrudgingly admit stand by his principles when shit goes sideways for him.
I can agree. I don't see the "anti-loli/porn" crusade as entirely rational and definitely not strategic in the slightest.
Well we aren't in a culture that is against it. This is a slippery slope we jumped on years earlier. You don't just go from "society that protects children" to "pedo shit." You gotta break down the family unit that protects them, expose them to sexually charged things much earlier and constantly, allow degenerate sexual types more freedom and thereby increased access to children.
That's why a solid cultural founding is important. It may not always be correct or good, the Christian dominant culture failings are well known, but it gives us a solid standing to resist evils with much of the time.
And yeah sometimes it does enshrine itself into law, but generally that's because if everyone is a certain culture it only makes sense to put it in writing to forbid something. See Islamic nations for example.
It wasn't a question of size, only the action and its failure to succeed I was referring to. 1.5% is also about how many LGBT people in society as well, so let's not discount how powerful a force that many can be if they are allowed.
I'm not even allowed in my hometown because of a false rape charge back when I was a child over 2 decades ago now. I am not allowed in a certain neighborhood in my current county because a couple of guys believe in a false rape charge a few years ago pointed at me when MeToo started. I've had to delete my physical presence to cover my own ass from actual direct consequences of people out for my head. Trust me, I know that fear.
I've also been tightly gripped enough to reverse hard on the intent. My start into this "culture war" was being an anti-feminist, which I became because a hardcore feminist counselor kept trying to beat me into submission.
And despite what it may seem, I'm a far right extremist with radical views. But I've been part of this "culture war" for decades, much longer than I bet almost anyone here. So I've learned to appear innocuous and unthreatening, even agreeable, to continue to speak and spread my beliefs. If I fully unvieled my power level I'd be met with hard resistance and instant bans everywhere. Being conscious of the threat of the squeeze is my everyday.
I agree entirely. We have a significant problem. I just see porn as the symptom, rather than the cause. If I had the power I'd be committing extreme acts to beat on the causes and (hopefully) the coomerism would decrease.