After an incident where anti-loli false flaggots got an account wrongfully banned for cp, ottman decided to ban loli by making false arguments similar to what 8chan owner jim watkins and gab owner andrew torba made.
Minds userbase is having none of it, and are actively calling ottman out for lying while demanding this decision be reversed.
new edit: ottman is having a meltdown, calling people bots and deleting posts.
edit: the mods need to consider banning the anti-loli spergs on this site for pointless infighting.
Maybe platforms claiming to be free speech should be forthright about why they're banning certain forms of free speech instead of attempting to be moral fags or disingenuous[1] about U.S. laws, assuming liability is the impetus.
1 - This includes not linking to laws that have provisions that may be contrary to illegality, or were struck down in applicability.
Oh, and this argument is also a larp to begin with because I see moral fags in this thread push this liability argument while simultaneously decrying it for ethical reasons in other comments, and labelling everyone that can be even bothered to put up any argument about why censorship might be a bad thing a pedo.
Plenty of condescending little fucks 'lurking' about.