After an incident where anti-loli false flaggots got an account wrongfully banned for cp, ottman decided to ban loli by making false arguments similar to what 8chan owner jim watkins and gab owner andrew torba made.
Minds userbase is having none of it, and are actively calling ottman out for lying while demanding this decision be reversed.
new edit: ottman is having a meltdown, calling people bots and deleting posts.
edit: the mods need to consider banning the anti-loli spergs on this site for pointless infighting.
Considering this discussion goes nowhere but screaming "you are a pedo, and you should die" rather than any discussion about how it should be banned and what are the ramifications of doing so its probably well described as pointless.
Nobody is shocked the moral crusaders can do nothing but screaming "think of the children!" like they always have, as their ability to logically think shuts down.
It is this one? Because I don't disagree and that's the kind of discussion to be had. I argued some time ago in regards to either Parler or Gab having the same controversy that a blanket, from the start, "no porn" clause would have avoided all the problems. Or at least no treat it as a moral soapbox while you do it so you don't rile up said coomers.
But, you can see from this entire discussion most people have opened with "get the rope" and that's its not a facade to say talking about this is pointless.