There shouldn't be advocacy organizations for everyone. You guarantee the balkanization of society purely along racial lines (which I understand you are perfectly fine with), but I'm not because I know full well that even in the best case scenario, you don't win, you just carve up the country and let Leftists rule over you because they have the right skin color, exactly in the same way that black people have sacrificed themselves to racialism.
The Jewish organizations haven't been taken over by socialists so why do you think this is inevitable?
Many Jewish organizations are taken over by Leftists because Leftists always seek any consolidated position of power to drive balkanization efforts. Managing ethnic protection rackets is how Progressive cities ran for nearly a century in America, and it always pushed more and more protectionism and paternalism.
Not only can you not avoid Leftist infiltration, you basically grantee it, especially with race.
We've been targeted for proletarian, dispossession, and disenfranchisement unlike everyone else.
That depends when and where, and that also depends on why you think the Left's "help" is beneficial. I wouldn't be so sure that 60 years of Black Identitarianism has done anything but kill the black family and community. The Left used to do the opposite until it became faux pas. That will change yet again. That's why Richard Spencer is entirely correct to start pushing towards the Left and Joe Biden. He's ahead of the curve and staking out ground for "White Affinity Groups" going forwards.
The Left have no principles, only the desire for power. They'll take whatever stance they need to take to get that power, regardless of who thinks they'll benefit, and how much the Left is actually going to hurt those "Useful Idiots".
So what do you suppose white people do to combat the flagrant discrimination we are facing
Attack Racialism as a system, stop letting the Left re-introduce. Otherwise, you'll just do precisely what Richard Spencer is doing and become a Leftist for White Affinity reasons, and you'll still have the country run by socialists.
To be clear here, you think Zionists lobbying organizations like AIPAC are leftist?
I don't know enough about the AIPAC specifically, but if they are, they wouldn't be the first.
Jews run these organizations, by the way.
Leftism doesn't need any particular race or religion to function. Any will do.
Blacks, despite their problems, have held stable as percentage of the population, and there is no way in hell you could get away with doing to them what's being done to whites now, either. They have shitty outcomes mostly because of their low IQs and high time preference.
That's not true, they've been displaced by Hispanics as the largest minority. That's why cutting down on illegal immigration improved black employment.
And yes, you can do to whites what's being done to blacks. Whites invented the Welfare State, white people live under many such systems all around the world. Whites are also pushing for whites in cities to effectively live like blacks through the Great Reset: full atomization, zero property ownership, total dependency on welfare (UBI & MMT).
You want to know what lowers IQ and promotes low time preference? Authoritarianism, incentive systems that promote Bio-Leninism, terrible diets from food scarcity, etc. It's why East Germans had a full standard deviation lower IQ from West Germans.
There is a zero % chance that the left is going to embrace white identity politics. Zero.
Yeah, yeah, and there's a zero percent chance that Leftists will support Nationalism, or that they'll abandon Racial Genetic Determinism, or that they'll make White Affinity group.
Are you alleging that Spence supported Biden because the Dems are more pro-white?
No, he's supporting them because they are making whites racially conscious. It's the only sensible decision. The right is, and his been in opposition to racial protectionism long time. Under Republicans and Conservatives, particularly under the kind of Goldwater Conservativism that dominated Conservative thought, there was zero desire to enact racial protectionism. When even the John Birch Society is saying that racial protectionism is a socialist plot, you've got no where to go as a racialist.
If the "Southern Strategy" as the Democrats put it, was so successful about garnering the support of racist whites to vote Republican, how is it that there has been no continuity of white racialism in a Republican dominated south? The Right wing does not provide for an avenue of racialism.
Spencer figured this out. Racialism isn't right-wing.
All the previous Fascists, National Socialists, White Supremacists of previous years constantly spouted Social Justice rhetoric. In the early part of the 20th century, White Nationalism was a progressive value. It's why those same Fascists, National Socialists, White Supremacists, Racial Progressives were Democrats. The Democratic party has always seen itself in racialist terms.
If the right-wing had even a minor desire to enact white racial protectionism by now, they would have done it.
Spencer is betting, correctly, that the progressive white-supremacists-with-a-guilty-conscience are going to stop wanting to feel guilty. Only the Left is pushing "White Affinity" groups, racial protectionism, and segregation. It's currently anti-white. It used to be anti-Black. It used to be anti-Asian. It used to be anti-Indian. That pendulum is going to swing again, and Spencer is waiting for his opportunity to latch onto it. He'll succeed.
Racial Justice for Whites is all he has to argue, and there will come a time when the Left goes down that road at this rate.
They're still about 13% of the population. That's whites that are being displaced.
Latinos and Blacks are competing for the same economics and locations. That's why building the wall and reducing immigration rose black employment.
West Germany was created would have been created by socialists since it was created after 1936. You sure do spout some serious BS.
Yes, but which of the two nations had more strict and authoritarian socialism, East Germany or West Germany? East did. They suffered for that. On a sliding scale of garbage, it turns out Communism is worse than "Social Democracy"
There shouldn't be advocacy organizations for everyone. You guarantee the balkanization of society purely along racial lines (which I understand you are perfectly fine with), but I'm not because I know full well that even in the best case scenario, you don't win, you just carve up the country and let Leftists rule over you because they have the right skin color, exactly in the same way that black people have sacrificed themselves to racialism.
Many Jewish organizations are taken over by Leftists because Leftists always seek any consolidated position of power to drive balkanization efforts. Managing ethnic protection rackets is how Progressive cities ran for nearly a century in America, and it always pushed more and more protectionism and paternalism.
Not only can you not avoid Leftist infiltration, you basically grantee it, especially with race.
That depends when and where, and that also depends on why you think the Left's "help" is beneficial. I wouldn't be so sure that 60 years of Black Identitarianism has done anything but kill the black family and community. The Left used to do the opposite until it became faux pas. That will change yet again. That's why Richard Spencer is entirely correct to start pushing towards the Left and Joe Biden. He's ahead of the curve and staking out ground for "White Affinity Groups" going forwards.
The Left have no principles, only the desire for power. They'll take whatever stance they need to take to get that power, regardless of who thinks they'll benefit, and how much the Left is actually going to hurt those "Useful Idiots".
Attack Racialism as a system, stop letting the Left re-introduce. Otherwise, you'll just do precisely what Richard Spencer is doing and become a Leftist for White Affinity reasons, and you'll still have the country run by socialists.
I don't know enough about the AIPAC specifically, but if they are, they wouldn't be the first.
Leftism doesn't need any particular race or religion to function. Any will do.
That's not true, they've been displaced by Hispanics as the largest minority. That's why cutting down on illegal immigration improved black employment.
And yes, you can do to whites what's being done to blacks. Whites invented the Welfare State, white people live under many such systems all around the world. Whites are also pushing for whites in cities to effectively live like blacks through the Great Reset: full atomization, zero property ownership, total dependency on welfare (UBI & MMT).
You want to know what lowers IQ and promotes low time preference? Authoritarianism, incentive systems that promote Bio-Leninism, terrible diets from food scarcity, etc. It's why East Germans had a full standard deviation lower IQ from West Germans.
Yeah, yeah, and there's a zero percent chance that Leftists will support Nationalism, or that they'll abandon Racial Genetic Determinism, or that they'll make White Affinity group.
Leftists always lie.
No, he's supporting them because they are making whites racially conscious. It's the only sensible decision. The right is, and his been in opposition to racial protectionism long time. Under Republicans and Conservatives, particularly under the kind of Goldwater Conservativism that dominated Conservative thought, there was zero desire to enact racial protectionism. When even the John Birch Society is saying that racial protectionism is a socialist plot, you've got no where to go as a racialist.
If the "Southern Strategy" as the Democrats put it, was so successful about garnering the support of racist whites to vote Republican, how is it that there has been no continuity of white racialism in a Republican dominated south? The Right wing does not provide for an avenue of racialism.
Spencer figured this out. Racialism isn't right-wing.
All the previous Fascists, National Socialists, White Supremacists of previous years constantly spouted Social Justice rhetoric. In the early part of the 20th century, White Nationalism was a progressive value. It's why those same Fascists, National Socialists, White Supremacists, Racial Progressives were Democrats. The Democratic party has always seen itself in racialist terms.
If the right-wing had even a minor desire to enact white racial protectionism by now, they would have done it.
Spencer is betting, correctly, that the progressive white-supremacists-with-a-guilty-conscience are going to stop wanting to feel guilty. Only the Left is pushing "White Affinity" groups, racial protectionism, and segregation. It's currently anti-white. It used to be anti-Black. It used to be anti-Asian. It used to be anti-Indian. That pendulum is going to swing again, and Spencer is waiting for his opportunity to latch onto it. He'll succeed.
Racial Justice for Whites is all he has to argue, and there will come a time when the Left goes down that road at this rate.
Latinos and Blacks are competing for the same economics and locations. That's why building the wall and reducing immigration rose black employment.
Yes, but which of the two nations had more strict and authoritarian socialism, East Germany or West Germany? East did. They suffered for that. On a sliding scale of garbage, it turns out Communism is worse than "Social Democracy"