And how would you stand up to these financial institutions? Just hope they fail and don't get bailed out next time?
Stop participating in them the way that most people do. That means stop participating in debt-based wealth building schemes.
Libertarian Socialism is where libertarianism started.
Libertarianism is just a renamed version of American Revolutionary Liberalism that founded the country.
What are you basing this on? The lack of a modern labor movement? A labor movement would be at odds with these woke corporations
That's not true. Woke corporations are perfectly fine with unions as long as those unions are part of a power sharing arrangement between them and the government. It's the same reason why Corporations will ask for regulation: it solidifies their power and kills competition.
This gets into one of the themes of our conversations: your lack of any consistent or coherent definition of leftism, the left, or any related terms.
I've been more consistent on that than most people I know. Why do you think I keep saying "Leftism is a philosophy of War"?
What constitutes a society or nation state then?
Because I don't want to repeat myself too much, and you could answer most of your deeper questions about by position on nations / nation states here, I'll just tell you I subscribe to Stoessinger's definition which I summarized and quoted in the top of that post, and is comprised of 7 characteristics (IIRC)
Yet libertarianism would produce them.
It does the opposite.
They promote both regulation and deregulation. They promote the maximum amount of freedom for themselves.
I agree mostly with the latter. The thing is that regulation typically grants them more freedom than de-regulation, due to the effect of being unable to be pressured by competition.
Stop participating in them the way that most people do. That means stop participating in debt-based wealth building schemes.
Libertarianism is just a renamed version of American Revolutionary Liberalism that founded the country.
That's not true. Woke corporations are perfectly fine with unions as long as those unions are part of a power sharing arrangement between them and the government. It's the same reason why Corporations will ask for regulation: it solidifies their power and kills competition.
I've been more consistent on that than most people I know. Why do you think I keep saying "Leftism is a philosophy of War"?
Because I don't want to repeat myself too much, and you could answer most of your deeper questions about by position on nations / nation states here, I'll just tell you I subscribe to Stoessinger's definition which I summarized and quoted in the top of that post, and is comprised of 7 characteristics (IIRC)
It does the opposite.
I agree mostly with the latter. The thing is that regulation typically grants them more freedom than de-regulation, due to the effect of being unable to be pressured by competition.