But it isn't real. If a group of people spends their whole time spreading hate for their own benefit, is it really fair to question those who fire it back?
That is the longest nothing answer I've read since the AstraZeneca safety statement. What do you mean? What should I do differently exactly?
I said something would pass and that they were openly talking about that. I didn't say it would for sure be that. In my reply to you I said something like this :
Sarah Everard is the UK's George Floyd, an excuse for massive societal change.
But it isn't real. If a group of people spends their whole time spreading hate for their own benefit, is it really fair to question those who fire it back?
That is the longest nothing answer I've read since the AstraZeneca safety statement. What do you mean? What should I do differently exactly?
I said something would pass and that they were openly talking about that. I didn't say it would for sure be that. In my reply to you I said something like this :
Criminalising speech against women fits that.