-me clueless politician calls "sustainable"? Because that is the only thing that could significantly reduce the highly-exaggerated impact farming supposedly has on the environment.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Well, then, stop using "Too many" this and that to justify hunting, then.
There's too many fuckign asians, but the politicos refuse to recognise whites got on the birth control bandwagon in the 1960s, but the other races got, and still get, free passes that no other creature, not whites or other animals, get.
Fuck them and their cultures.
Prince Charles adn his ilk should have hunted the pakis and fed them to tigers instead of the other way round.
Capitalism does NOT need "constant growth". It could do fine with the sort of steady state population demanded of every other creature on earth.
Othwerwise, humans are no difrfernt than the monsters in independence day.
China wasn't "killing babies" because of fake birth control, they were killing GIRL babies to make more men for their army and genetic swamping. You could CULL 1 billion chinese and they'd still be the most populous nation on earth, and india would still be 2 if you did the same to them.
And hunting ain't culling, btw, it's just eliminating the unlucky. A true "cull" would be actual EUgenics (rather than the DYSgenics humans oftten subject their domesticates to. It's kidn of odd that animal breeders care more about genetic health of other species than humans care about the genetic health of their own. I wonder what would happen if humans found themselves in the position of merles, where two of the same pheno-genotype doesn't dare breed ....)
Chinese prefer to abort girl babies because Chinese wombyn can't carry the family name and that would make their clan go extinct, plus they can only have 1 child, so obviously only the male child gets to survive.