Isn't the building itself "artwork" under this logic?
Remember that story about the Chrysler Building not appearing in the Spider-Man Miles Morales game because of copyright issues? Why do some people have the right to the images of their property and others do not? Is a developer not entitled to the sweat of his own building?
I always hated graffiti and I always had the sneaking suspicion that all of these "artists" don't put their own art on their own houses. Or maybe they do. Or maybe they're just like dogs pissing all over the place but would never piss on their own pillow or bed.
Remember that story about the Chrysler Building not appearing in the Spider-Man Miles Morales game because of copyright issues? Why do some people have the right to the images of their property and others do not? Is a developer not entitled to the sweat of his own building?
I always hated graffiti and I always had the sneaking suspicion that all of these "artists" don't put their own art on their own houses. Or maybe they do. Or maybe they're just like dogs pissing all over the place but would never piss on their own pillow or bed.