As this election has shown, fighting fair isn't exactly working out. But thankfully the enemy is also vulnerable to the same tactics they have used against us.
At this point win or lose, were insurgents. Even in a 2nd term Trump administration, we will still have to deal with tech censorship, MSM controlling the narrative, and politicians as well as authority figures such as judges, DA's, and prosecutors subverting the system.
Thus the only way I see us surviving if not winning is to essentially imbed ourselves amongst the enemy and take them out from within using their own tactics.
The MeToo movement falling out of favor with many Leftists is an example of their tactics being used against them. The Left in many cases has no problem with cannibalizing their own. Their reactions are often emotionally based and they are easy to manipulate with keywords or ideas. Which is why they often appropriate names which inherently mean positive things such as "Anti Fascist" or "Black Lives Matter". It's naturally difficult to argue against those simple concepts in constrained platforms like Twitter especially to imbeciles which make up the bulk of people who react to these things. This is often why keywords such as "rape", "racist", "white supremacist" are quickly thrown around since people instantly react to those. Controlling the initial narrative is key.
As we have seen with this past election, the breakdown of those on the right has grown in terms of diversity. The Left no longer has a monopoly on blacks, latinos, asians and the lgbt. Meanwhile the Left has grown in terms of white support. This works against them since the primary boogeyman of the left has been white people. Thus being primarily made up of white people themselves, it makes them easier targets to their own tactics.
The strategy is simple, simply pay attention to what new thing they are up in arms against them use and abuse it on known Leftists. I've already found success in this on a personal level, using Leftist talking points to demolish another Leftist is surprisingly easy. They are conditioned to be on the offensive and instantly being apologetically submissive to these accusations that when levied against them. They simply crumble. When carried out on popular social media platforms, watching the ensuing dogpiling of other leftists is beyond hilarious and satisfying.
What is the ultimate goal of this?
Simple, the reality is that Trump was sadly more like a diagnosis of cancer that has infected this country rather than a cure. Even with him as President, the ideology of Woke had already taken root in almost every facet of our society. In fact, him being President only emboldened them even further, giving them more justification for their ideology. Thus by using their tactics and ideology against them. It will eventually cause enough self-damage that eventually they will naturally turn against it naturally. Similarly to the MeToo movement being abandoned, key figures started to fear being accused themselves. Thus when the keyfigures who are predominantly white realize they are now vulnerable to their own rhetoric. They will in time naturally abandon this ideology, or fall victim to it.
I welcome all thoughts, comments, and critiques of this battle plan. Thank you
Well, that's the point, we use the narrative against them.
As I pointed out the bulk of their base is currently made up of white men. For instance, according to Critical Race Theory, white men are basically scum. It didn't say "white men except for left wingers or antifa types" it just said, white men. Meaning, they are included in their own shit list. Thus we exploit that.
The big targets like politicians will probably be immune to this. Because naturally the MSM will play defense for them or tech companies will simply quash any talk of it.
But the smaller to middle-sized targets that make up their base. Like, let's say the occasional blue checkmark on Twitter. If they suddenly fall victim to a sexual assault allegation or something of the like. It's usually quite damaging to them.
Think of it this way, imagine accusing an ISIS member of heresy and watching them get beheaded by other ISIS members. One, you managed to remove one enemy and two, it puts into question how valid their methods are. Other members will question if the member they really was a heretic and starts sowing the seeds of doubt in their mind.
That's feeding into the belief system that people are defined by which groups they belong to. I'd rather move people based on opening dialog and dispelling this negative culture of divisive rhetoric.
Edit reply: That's not the same thing, there's a bunch of people who don't know shit or care about politics and philosophy, they haven't broken free of the programming. When people see they've been lied to, it's much more persuasive than trying to break the cognitive dissonance.
You're going to be applying this to people who already believe that so it changes nothing if anything. All you're doing is directing their malice towards one of their own.
Obviously use common sense and good judgment when applying these tactics. If you're dealing with some schmuck that just gets their opinions from Twitter. Then why even waste your time?
This is designed to be a tactic aimed at actually dismantling key figures. As in Blue Checkmarks with tens of thousands of followers.
I'm glad you mean the priests and not the congregation, but it's not a war of ideals, it's an information war.
They also won't have a second of shame to redefine what 'white men' means, so if you think this is actually exploitable, you're wrong.