Twitter was already doing this since early 2019. The major difference here is the use of all this newspeak terminology of "child sexual exploitation material" rather than "child pornography" in order to further muddy the line between 2D and 3D.
This term and others like it come from the Luxembourg Guidelines, a document whose creation was facilitated by international NGOs, but was primarily spearheaded by EPCAT, an especially sketchy NGO that claims to be fighting child prostitution and pornography but from my own investigations is pushing for internet censorship by using the issue of CP as a trojan horse.
One should be aware that ECPAT was also the primary architect behind the UN's OHCHR revision last year which demonized loli/shota and other such content.
Twitter was already doing this since early 2019. The major difference here is the use of all this newspeak terminology of "child sexual exploitation material" rather than "child pornography" in order to further muddy the line between 2D and 3D.
This term and others like it come from the Luxembourg Guidelines, a document whose creation was facilitated by international NGOs, but was primarily spearheaded by EPCAT, an especially sketchy NGO that claims to be fighting child prostitution and pornography but from my own investigations is pushing for internet censorship by using the issue of CP as a trojan horse.
One should be aware that ECPAT was also the primary architect behind the UN's OHCHR revision last year which demonized loli/shota and other such content.