It's diabolically brilliant in its simplicity.

And I'm not talking about the twitter drones who vomit up the talking points as easily as they say orange man bad. Those people are little more than bobble heads that manage speech somehow.

No, I'm talking about the thought leaders.

As long as the person is doing what they want and is given accolades and public opinion is in their favor, they can sing the 'woman's' favor and call people critical of them misogynist and buzzword, buzzword, buzzword.

The minute that 'woman' fucks up or steps outside the plantation, BAM! They're a man again, and it's all the fault of the patriarchy.

It's basically win-win. They can play the girl-power card when they're up and patriarchy poker when their down.

I'm not saying it's the case, I just think it's an interesting thread to pull on...

Dunno why, just sounds funny I guess?

Rolfe is something of youtube aristocracy, having been on youtube since about 2006, so seeing him mirror content off of youtube is, in my opinion, a promising sign that we're breaking through the noise, even if he did it for purely pragmatic reasons. Rolfe is a fairly apolitical guy, so don't expect a lot of "Row Row, Fight the Powah" from him, but it proves that even bigger independent names( 3.55M subs and 1,978,090,622 views on youtube) are feeling the stifling of bigtech censorship and shopping around for alternatives.

Do what you want, but it might be a good idea if fans of his content show him that we'll follow him wherever he finds a home, even if youtube decides to abuse him.

Do you prefer to focus on specific skills, or do you try to fill out primary traits first?

Maybe you do something else?