The main source of the Yasuke story was from Jesuit chronicles and Jesuits were known to make up a lot of crap.(it should be noted that Jesuits were famous for having jewish converts btw and they came from Spain and Protugal that were countries that made their jewish population convert. The current globohomo Pope is a Jesuit incidentally)

. Nobunaga never mentioned Yasuke in his own writings. Which given that Nobunaga would write poems about pretty much anything he laid eyes on, suggests that the two never met. The sole corroborating account stated that one of the jesuits had a black servant, and they presented him as a curiosity to Nobunaga's court, but there is evidence of nothing else.

And here's another strain on historical credulity. Supposedly Yasuke fought for Nobunaga as a samurai(Even at this , this is ridiculous because samurai were the nobility caste you had to be born in to a samurai family to be a samurai , you couldn't just "become one"). One of the claims is that he spoke fluent Japanese.

The time period between when they supposedly met and when Nobunaga was assassinated by Akechi Mitsuhide was... three months.

A black guy from what would now be Morocco, probably a slave to the Jesuits , and someone whose language skills would have included mostly broken Portuguese, supposedly learned one of the most difficult languages on earth in three months. For reference, Japanese has three formal alphabets.

There is nothing about the story that is historically credible. There is more evidence of Santa Claus than there is of Yasuke.

There's a reason why Medieval Japan aggressively expelled the Jesuits and called them spies that were looking to subvert and conquer Japan.

Im told by various groups that "White supremacists" and leftists and muslims are antisemitic but for some reason the targets always seem to be anything except jews. Even when its about "free Palestine " its the Churches that get attacked and not the synagogues.

Really really weird

In the few that DO include jews , jews has consistently been number 1 by a large margin. Why do they exclude that in most graphs/data about income by race?

I even saw a reddit page saying that the stereotype that jews are rich is wrong because the wikipedia article that had data about richest ethnic groups in America said it was indians . Never mind the fact that jews WERENT EVEN INCLUDED in that article . Because every time they actually are included they always come up on top by a large margin .

Why? why are they scared of people knowing that they are the richest? Its taboo to even say that "jews are rich" hmmm

Is that 21st century conservatism is simply 20th century communism. A jewish woman claiming to be "proud to be Japanese" is subversive as Japan only sees people of pure Japanese blood as being Japanese (As it should be) and she's actively trying to subvert this norm, and trying to push the idea that anyone can be Japanese.

But the West has been so utterly subverted that a foreigner claiming to be "proud to be German" or "proud to be Swedish" is considered "based" , instead of being considered subversive that they are even trying to claim that they are German or Swedish when they are not.

Its the racial version of trannism. (I feel like im a Japanese therefore i am a Japanese. I feel like im a woman therefore i am a woman)