His claim is about Jewish terrorism. That has nothing to do with US Independence.
You're incapable of rational thought. The "terrorism" referred to killed 250 Arabs and fewer Brits; no the UK did NOT give up any colonies because of that.
Extremely stupid of you to assume I haven't read all this, but that's to be expected of you.
Nothing about it aligns with his claim, which is that's why the UK gave up it's colonies, or any of them.
You've never heard of the King David Hotel bombing?
Very silly of you to assume that.
That's not what UK gave up on all their colonies, or any of them.
You should expound on that idea.
It seems the British Empire collapsed after WWII, but you seem to be referring to something else as a"terror campaign."
I don't think the two are mutually exclusive.
Also, pretty much any time military conflict is engaged, there are multiple objectives. If you want to see who did not have a Rothschild majority owned central bank since 1935, just look where US has pointed its guns. I do think that's the single biggest factor. Obama's "JV" comment was kinda telling, but recently it's more plausible that continued US troop presence in Syria was focused on containing ISIS.
That doesn't say anything about potential clandestine operations, successfully hidden from the public.
Since Assad left, US has attacked known ISIS positions extensively.
That was a great article, I bookmarked it. Meanwhile, overnight Israel flew over 250 sorties, destroying the entire Syrian Navy, and as much of their ammo depots and air power as possible. Also abandoned is Russian high tech radar, which our IC will want to get their hands on as it could give us a big advantage at a time when Russian R&D isn't advancing so rapidly.
LOTS is happening very quickly, with China not being outdone ...
The high ground you're referring to is Mt Hermon, mentioned 13x in the KJV. About half of it was already within Israel's borders, so this isn't the land grab OP tries to make it look like. Israel has been destroying potent weapons in Syria before their enemies can capture them to attack Israel with, this includes an armored convoy of 100 Hezbollah vehicles.
The suddenness of this comparatively drastic shake up in Syria after essentially a stalemate for so long is getting significant media attention.
I agree with you - meh. I'm not quite on board with glassing the whole region, but they are going to continue killing each other and we can't stop that no matter how we try. There are lots of good things that could be done domestically with tax dollars, anything else amounts to theft. We have our own tyrants to topple.
To prevent ISIS from controlling the oil fields, allowing them to continue being a major PITA.
The Syrian civil war is not over.
How long do you suppose it will take before the true level of CIA involvement in the recent unbelievably fast regime change will be discovered?
That's unpossible, he promised HTS won't use terror tactics on civilians, will insure equal rights for all religious expression, and I'm pretty sure he'll walk your dog, too.
This is probably a bigger reason than the oil pipeline Assad was preventing.
CIA gonna CIA.
You're oblivious to our tech industry being centered in Jerusalem due to safety from earthquake.
Defender.
Yes that's exactly why US troops are there 🙄
"Learning"
You should know better.
The major work of the most influential Prof of both Clintons lays their agenda bare: Tragedy and Hope.
I like Ike 👍
$290B doesn't need to be printed, it's all ones and zeros..
This is so uninformed as to qualify as disinformation, just like the OP tweet.
The reality is FAR more complex, just like basically everything in the middle east.
Count the recent examples of a tyrant being overthrown and how that affects peace and stability afterwards.
Exactly why "conspiracy theorist" was popularized by the CIA to try to destroy the credibility of anyone who knew what was going on re: the Vietnam war and JFK's assassination. What war has US been involved in since that didn't include substantial efforts to manufacturer consent among the electorate?
CFR enters the chat
That's not the sole reason it was created in 1921, they also put Marxists in charge of academia.
This is almost a reasonable comment, the main problems are
-
the US federal government isn't functioning as it's designed to but is way out of whack
-
US was created specifically to NOT be a democracy, so speaking in those terms gives leftards WAY too much power to begin with.
Never let the left control the language! (SEE: 1984)
Now tell us how great Saddam Hussein and his Sons were.
Lol I did not.
You reduce yourself to being functionally illiterate; you should put down the shovel.