Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Unfortunately, u/BandageBandolier it is worse than that. This is the law u/AbleistSL wants abolished, section 63 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008. As you can see it is the law that bans 'Extreme Pornography'. It basically bans snuff porn, mutilation porn (people's genitals being injured), bestiality porn, necrophilia porn, and rape porn. Not cartoon porn - it has to be realistic to be covered by the extreme pornography law.

So u/AbleistSL wants that legalised. He is seriously arguing that unless Farage legalises snuff porn, mutilation porn and bestiality porn he will lose. It is an obvious troll post or he is unwell.

I am concerned that AbleistSL's real motive is to promote extremist positions here in order to make the site look bad. His advocacy that one group should be, "disposed of" looks to me like a Rule Two breach since it by implication looks like he is advocating they should be killed. Similarly a Rule Sixteen breach.

I am reporting it here for that reason and tagging u/C u/DomitiusOfMassilia and u/ClockworkFool

42 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Unfortunately, u/BandageBandolier it is worse than that. This is section 63 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008. As you can see it is the law that bans 'Extreme Pornography'. It basically bans snuff porn, mutilation porn (people's genitals being injured), bestiality porn, necrophilia porn, and rape porn. Not cartoon porn - it has to be realistic to be covered by the extreme pornography law.

So u/AbleistSL wants that legalised. He is seriously arguing that unless Farage legalises snuff porn, mutilation porn and bestiality porn he will lose. It is an obvious troll post or he is unwell.

I am concerned that AbleistSL's real motive is to promote extremist positions here in order to make the site look bad. His advocacy that one group should be, "disposed of" looks to me like a Rule Two breach since it by implication looks like he is advocating they should be killed. Similarly a Rule Sixteen breach.

I am reporting it here for that reason and tagging u/C u/DomitiusOfMassilia and u/ClockworkFool

42 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Unfortunately, u/BandageBandolier it is worse than that. This is section 63 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008. As you can see it is the law that bans 'Extreme Pornography'. It basically bans snuff porn, mutilation porn (people's genitals being injured), bestiality porn, necrophilia porn, and rape porn. Not cartoon porn - it has to be realistic to be covered by the extreme pornography law.

So u/AbleistSL wants that legalised. He is seriously arguing that unless Farage legalises snuff porn, mutilation porn and bestiality porn he will lose. It is an obvious troll post or he is unwell.

I am concerned that AbleistSL's real motive is to promote extremist positions here in order to make the site look bad. His advocacy that one group should be, "disposed of" looks to me like a Rule Two breach since it by implication looks like he is advocating they should be killed.

I am reporting it here for that reason and tagging u/C u/DomitiusOfMassilia and u/ClockworkFool

42 days ago
1 score