The Problem of Surplus White Men
(www.resilience.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
Surplus implies quota, so I'm left wondering what's the 'correct' amount of this immutable characteristic?
Women already said it.
"The male population should be reduced to 10% and power restored to women."
So, it's 10% of current levels.
Or a representative proportion of 10% of the total male population.
How did I know it'd be you answering that particular rhetorical question? It also ignores the 'white' part in white men so significantly lower than that but we all know your focus. All immutable characteristic quotas are bad, no exceptions. It's why I specified the implied quota.
Well, I actually did provide an answer to how many white men would be retained. It would likely be a proportion equal to their representation in the male population prior to the "Future is Female" plan being executed.
Suprlus implies too many in relative terms before your reduction to 10% in total. So we need that number first.