As many have noticed, several anti-loli dipshits who cater to the anti-regressive movement, like the gab founder, have expressed remarks such as "satanic garbage" in regards to mere offensive pornographic artwork, and has also attempted to ban porn but relented due to a larger outcry.
I suspect that these individuals are tradcons, and are attempting to take over the opposition of the regressive left to further their personal agenda, which will only damage it by fracturing the dissident right and driving off the libertarian left.
I also suspect that 8chan owner Jim banned lolicon from his site because he personally hates it, and simply asked his lawyer to dig something up to use as an excuse, which fratured the community and put any user who decided to use Mark Mann's 8chan.moe at risk of abuse by the owner, who has a history of being a goddamn lolcow who got his nudes leaked and is accused of violating sex offender laws.
On the subject of Mark Mann, he defends unteralterbach despite the fact it depicts real minors, showed it to his underage niece and got disowned by his aunt for it, and is accused of running CP discord servers.
Probably not a popular take, but honestly? I don't see the appeal of loli stuff unless it's wholesome; such as, Yotsubato!, but in the end, it's just shit scribble, and not meant to be fine art or social commentary. I certainly don't agree with writing a manga or comic where the character is explicitly stated to be a young child -- not a teen mind you -- and is put into sexual situations. That said, these are not real people, and I personally don't care what people feel like drawing and publishing. They're adults; they can handle the consequences of public opinion themselves. But what really pisses me off is this idea that if a woman is drawn with small tits, she's a child -- and if she's drawn with big tits, you're sexualizing women to attract the male gaze.
I've dated a few petite women, and at no point while doing things with them did my mind somehow infantilize the girl I was with. I don't understand how they can so callously shame smaller women into feeling like they're less of a woman than their peers due to their overall size. It's such a shallow and pernicious thing to do.
"Cute girls doing cute things" isn't lolicon. Lolicon is a type of porn; it's short for Lolita-complex, where complex is Engrish for "fixation."