Speaking of the paradox of tolerance, here's a pretentious analysis of Dirty Harry I came across in the wild
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
The people who think the paradox of tolerance is in any way insightful are retards. Repost from my comment in the other thread:
The presuppositions underlying "the paradox of tolerance" are A) that being Tolerant is necessary and good, and B) that our view of what to tolerate is correct. When you analyze "the paradox of tolerance" with these identified, it simply reduces down to, "societies can decide and enforce their social landscape" which is a blindingly banal thing to say. It also means that whoever is in power can enforce social rules, which is also obvious. Luckily, this is also an invitation for dissidents like us to accrue power.
The people who give it any credence are retarded leftists. These are the same people who think the bully who hits a student, and the student who hit the bully back, committed equally condemnable acts. Because they are so retarded they can't distinguish between aggressor and victim acting in self defense. They just see the act, not the context. It has to be some mental deficiency. They go through life incapable of processing certain truths or logic. I half wonder if they only see half the colors we do. Literally their worldview is so askew from reality that you wonder what else they are experiencing differently from fully functioning people.