Yes, yes, meta posts are gay, I know.
I do think it's important to hold mods accountable, though, remain aware of what is going on, and also to remind people that mod logs are, in fact, public.
Fuckery #1, #2, and #3:
Dom banned u/btbw for 256 days for "conniving merchants and cultists that manipulate all sides behind the scenes" in the context of Legend of the Galactic Heroes. Without comment or explanation directly to the person he was banning. He banned him because someone else responded with "Cool it with antisemitic remarks" (which I've seen reported repeatedly, someone really doesn't like that meme), and said the parent comment did break the rules.
Now, that parent could have also been reported, but it is funny that Dom has said he can't hunt down parent comments before, here:
When I click on your comment from my feed, I only see your comment, not it's parent.
Now, here's where it gets really fucky. He unbanned btbw, admitting his mistake...then immediately bans him again for...no reason.
You know what, fair enough. I'll restore the comment...approved a comment by btbw...unbanned btbw...banned btbw - 128 days with reason: Previous ban rescinded. Ban reduced to 128 days.
Excuse me, but what the fuck? He was previously not banned, obviously, since he could comment. His only offending comment was found to not be rule-breaking. His ban was rescinded. Then he was banned again (also with no direct communication), with the reason apparently being that he was unbanned? What's this "ban reduced" nonsense?
This is like being arrested for resisting arrest.
Fuckeries #4-8:
Dom claims to always leave comments when he removes comments, with why it broke the rules. He removed the following four comments with no explanation:
https://unscored.arete.network/c/KotakuInAction2/p/199hNv1Ent/x/c/4ZGS2oYQNoe/
https://unscored.arete.network/c/KotakuInAction2/p/199OdDkqgy/x/c/4ZFCcbXztx3/
https://unscored.arete.network/c/KotakuInAction2/p/199Ohxq6ar/x/c/4ZGRjlEQg2S/
https://unscored.arete.network/c/KotakuInAction2/p/199OdKaan6/x/c/4ZGRjpqZAQy/
I don't even think any of that is explicitly rule-breaking, and it was removed without comment. Looks like Dom got up on the wrong side of the bed again.
You've got this a bit backwards. I banned him for 128 days for the initial conniving merchants comment. Then for 256 days for the "cry out as they strike you" post.
It was brought to my attention that the first ban was illegitimate, so I went searching for the parent comments to see if he was talking about a story. Meh, he kinda was, but I know what he was trying to do, but I decided to let it slide. Thus, I removed the ban he got for his "conniving merchants" comment.
That reduces his ban length from 256 days down to 128 days. These are two separate instances.
No, you've got it backwards, dumbass.
"Cries out in pain," 4:53 AM.
"Conniving merchants," 5:05 AM
And the other guy's "Cool it" comment, 5:04 AM, then edited four hours later.
Those are your comment times, but you can see the removal times as well. Same as the comments, but one minute later each. "Cries out" was banned first. It's right there in the logs.
Not sure why you'd lie. Especially when it doesn't even matter. Neither ban was justified, and you're acting a fool again.
How had he "asserted that hooliganism is an inherent aspect of jews," because he pointed out additional context to some whiny Jews saying they were attacked for being Jews?
Where did he say anything was "inherent?"
Kienan. Stop. Look at the times of my actions before screaming that I'm a dumbass and that I'm lying.
You:
Now...also you:
Yeah. You're a dumbass.
You're now saying the opposite, while agreeing with what I said, while saying I'm wrong.
The actual fuck is wrong with you?
This is laughably ridiculous, even by your standards.
Look: apparently I misremembered it initially, and I didn't insult you about it. The timeline is there. Ban for 128, then a ban of 256, then a reduction to 128. Those are two separate rule violations.
That's all there is to this.