Trusted flagers, if I read the law correctly, is a glorified moderator approved by one of the communication agencies(FCC for americans) of a member state. And forces companies to prioritise reports from them.
A. Nothing says the companies can't reject them for being frivolous
B. Companies can (at least theoretically) report to the approver that the "trusted flagger" is a giant faggot and only spams frivolous requests to at least get them suspended until they investigate themselves and find no wrongdoing
Of course, by the nature of how these guys are approved is completely nonsensical.
The trusted flaggers will keep statistics on how many of their complaints were acted upon and if any platform doesnt censor as much as the others, that platform will be prosecuted by authorities.
Trusted flagers, if I read the law correctly, is a glorified moderator approved by one of the communication agencies(FCC for americans) of a member state. And forces companies to prioritise reports from them.
A. Nothing says the companies can't reject them for being frivolous
B. Companies can (at least theoretically) report to the approver that the "trusted flagger" is a giant faggot and only spams frivolous requests to at least get them suspended until they investigate themselves and find no wrongdoing
Of course, by the nature of how these guys are approved is completely nonsensical.
The trusted flaggers will keep statistics on how many of their complaints were acted upon and if any platform doesnt censor as much as the others, that platform will be prosecuted by authorities.