https://www.lp.org/news-press-releases-libertarians-press-congress-on-doma-dont-ask-dont-tell/
With them electing a non Mises candidate, I thought I would dig for their official stance on an issue that had a very socially engineered public discourse surrounding it. Ron Paul was right that don't ask don't tell was a fine policy. Our pre-boomer ancestors knew faggotry oft enough resulted in degenerate behavior outside the bedroom. This policy made the point to fuck who you want, but dont be a retard with no opsec, or a narcissist who puts oneself before your fellow servicemen. Also, don't engage in witch-hunts.
I utterly despise how the gay agenda was actually a thing, not the bugbear we made fun of . This goes beyond letting Peter Thiel and Dave Rubin sex up their husbands; even then I have mixed opinions on both of them I didn't have 6 years prior. The self-righteous, dogmatic language the lgb-t-map+ "community" embraces to force their preferences without responsible society's consent should be reason enough to fall back to early 20th century policy. Doesn't matter what the movement is, such tactics cause societal collapse, just waiting for the inevitable trigger.
Point is, right-wing libertarians really need to find a new label that also separates them from the soccer-moms for Bush/Trump. That the hippie LPUSA suffers from so much Gramscian damage that they would lend any lip service to what is substantially and morally bankrupt has invalidated the uniparty alternative. If for the simple reason that there is no right to serve in the military, only equal opportunity to all civilians.
I absolutely agree and I'm one of those Libertarians who completely distanced myself from the Libertarian movement when I saw how many of them were utterly cucking themselves to leftist causes. The final straw for me though was when I saw two of three Libertarian US party candidates try and 'debate' the gender pay gap and only one of them had the balls to call it out for not being real as any decent economist would and the economics side of thing is what Libertarians traditionally prided themselves on the most.
These days I side with the Voluntaryist/Ancaps most, maybe even Minarchism, I think Voluntaryist appeals to me because its just a pretty extreme form of live and let live plus political experimentation. I would love to see balkanization happen and just let the leftists form their own crappy little society while everybody normal does their own thing.
I also see the appeal of privatised nukes :D
One thing libertarians/minarchists/etc always seem to stumble over is what happens when they run into a larger and stronger group that doesn't share their ideals.
That group will follow the non aggression principle... or else!
I think communism is less utopian than libertarianism. Total cope ideology for people who know the system is fucked but still don't want to be called racist or mean.
The response from anyone who's an actual Libertarian should be the greek city states or something similar, not rolling over and going "Oh well, guess we'll virtue signal for brownie points and try to join the WEF". It kind of reminds me of Sinn Fein, for those who don't know that party was set up as a way of sort of legitimising the IRA among other things and trying to get the Irish more peaceful with representation. In the end it turned out to be just another completely cucked leftist party.
I'm very much in the absolute minority, I'm an old school Ron Paul type guy originally, which is why I basically have zero representation out there realistically and won't associate myself with people who openly hijack my values or for that matter grossly misrepresent them.
I definitely agree about voluntarists. I was actually explaining minarchism to someone last week